We perform Observation System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model to test how well methane emissions over North America can be resolved using measurements from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) and similar high-resolution satellite sensors. We focus analysis on the impacts of i) spatial errors in the prior emissions, and ii) model transport errors. Along with a standard scale-factor (SF) optimization we conduct a set of inversions using alternative formalisms that aim to overcome limitations in the SF-based approach that arise for missing sources. We show that 4D-Var analysis of the TROPOMI data can improve monthly emission estimates at 25 km even with a spatially biased prior or model transport errors (42–93% domain-wide bias reduction; R increases from 0.51 up to 0.73). However, when both errors are present, no single inversion framework can successfully improve both the overall bias and spatial distribution of fluxes relative to the prior on the 25 km model grid. In that case, the ensemble-mean optimized fluxes have a domain-wide bias of 77 Gg/d (comparable to that in the prior), with spurious source adjustments compensating for the transport errors. Increasing observational coverage through longer-timeframe inversions does not significantly change this picture. An inversion formalism that optimizes emission enhancements rather than scale factors exhibits the best performance for identifying missing sources, while an approach combining a uniform background emission with the prior inventory yields the best performance in terms of overall spatial fidelity—even in the presence of model transport errors. However, the standard SF optimization outperforms both of these for the magnitude of the domain-wide flux. For the common scenario in which prior errors are non-random, approximate posterior error reduction calculations for the inversions reflect the sensitivity to observations but have no spatial correlation with the actual emission improvements. This demonstrates that such information content analysis can be used for general observing system characterization but does not describe the spatial accuracy of the posterior emissions or of the actual emission improvements. Findings here highlight the need for careful evaluation of potential missing sources in prior emission datasets and for robust accounting of model transport errors in inverse analyses of the methane budget.

The rate of increase in atmospheric methane (CH4) has accelerated in recent years, reaching 15 ppb/yr in 2020, with causes that are not well understood. Given methane’s potent global warming potential (85x that of CO2 on a 20-year timescale), this indicates a crucial need to better understand its current budget. Near-global high-precision methane column observations from the TROPOMI satellite sensor offer a major advance for mapping methane fluxes. Here we combine two years of TROPOMI data with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model in a 4D-Var framework to optimize global methane emissions at high spatial resolution. The inversions converge on distinct sets of solutions depending on whether methane loss rates are also simultaneously optimized or not. Findings thus show that even with the dense TROPOMI coverage, methane budget inferences remain sensitive to the prior assumptions for OH. The ensemble of solutions adheres to a close linear relationship between the derived global source and sink terms, with each distinct result successfully improving the simulation of globally-available in-situ data. Solutions with methane loss rates treated as a hard constraint exhibit the best consistency with remote OH and CO measurements and with the background seasonal cycle in methane. We further employ multiple inversion formalisms to test the solution sensitivity to the assumed prior emissions. This presentation will explore the derived emission adjustments in terms of their implications for methane flux drivers and potential missing sources.