The long-term net sink of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the northern permafrost region is projected to weaken or shift under climate change. But large uncertainties remain, even on present-day GHG budgets. We compare bottom-up (data-driven upscaling, process-based models) and top-down budgets (atmospheric inversion models) of the main GHGs (CO2, CH4, and N2O) and lateral fluxes of C and N across the region over 2000-2020. Bottom-up approaches estimate higher land to atmosphere fluxes for all GHGs compared to top-down atmospheric inversions. Both bottom-up and top-down approaches respectively show a net sink of CO2 in natural ecosystems (-31 (-667, 559) and -587 (-862, -312), respectively) but sources of CH4 (38 (23, 53) and 15 (11, 18) Tg CH4-C yr-1) and N2O (0.6 (0.03, 1.2) and 0.09 (-0.19, 0.37) Tg N2O-N yr-1) in natural ecosystems. Assuming equal weight to bottom-up and top-down budgets and including anthropogenic emissions, the combined GHG budget is a source of 147 (-492, 759) Tg CO2-Ceq yr-1 (GWP100). A net CO2 sink in boreal forests and wetlands is offset by CO2 emissions from inland waters and CH4 emissions from wetlands and inland waters, with a smaller additional warming from N2O emissions. Priorities for future research include representation of inland waters in process-based models and compilation of process-model ensembles for CH4 and N2O. Discrepancies between bottom-up and top-down methods call for analyses of how prior flux ensembles impact inversion budgets, more in-situ flux observations and improved resolution in upscaling.

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is the most important stratospheric ozone-depleting agent based on current emissions and the third largest contributor to increased net radiative forcing. Increases in atmospheric N2O have been attributed primarily to enhanced soil N2O emissions. Critically, contributions from soils in the Northern High Latitudes (NHL, >50°N) remain poorly quantified despite their vulnerability to permafrost thawing induced by climate change. An ensemble of six terrestrial biosphere models suggests NHL soil N2O emissions doubled since the preindustrial 1860s, increasing on average by 2.0±1.0 Gg N yr-1 (p<0.01). This trend reversed after the 1980s because of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application in non-permafrost regions and increased plant growth due to CO2 fertilization suppressed emissions. However, permafrost soil N2O emissions continued increasing attributable to climate warming; the interaction of climate warming and increasing CO2 concentrations on nitrogen and carbon cycling will determine future trends in NHL soil N2O emissions.

The depth distribution of carbon inputs to soil has been unquantified globally, hindering our understanding of belowground carbon dynamics. We synthesize global observational data to infer the allocation of carbon inputs to soil depths down to 2 m, and map depth-specific carbon inputs globally at 1 km resolution. Global average carbon input to the 0–20 cm soil layer is 1.1 Mg C ha–1 yr–1, accounting for >50% of total soil carbon inputs. Across the globe, the depth distribution of carbon inputs shows large variability, and there are relatively more carbon inputs to deeper layers in hotter and drier regions. Edaphic, climatic and topographic properties (in the order of importance) explain >80% of such variability in soil depths; and the direction and magnitude of the influence of individual properties are soil depth- and biome-dependent. Our results provide global benchmarks for prediction of whole-soil carbon profiles across global biomes.

We synthesized N2O emissions over North America using 17 bottom-up (BU) estimates from 1980-2016 and five top-down (TD) estimates from 1998-2016. The BU-based total emission shows a slight increase owing to U.S. agriculture, while no consistent trend is shown in TD estimates. During 2007-2016, North American N2O emissions are estimated at 1.7 (1.0-3.0) Tg N yr-1 (BU) and 1.3 (0.9-1.5) Tg N yr-1 (TD). Anthropogenic emissions were twice larger than natural fluxes from soil and water. Direct agricultural and industrial activities accounted for 68% of total anthropogenic emissions, 71% of which was contributed by the U.S. Our estimates of U.S. agricultural emissions are comparable to the EPA greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory, which includes estimates from IPCC tier 1 (emission factor) and tier 3 (process-based modeling) approaches. Conversely, our estimated agricultural emissions for Canada and Mexico are twice as large as the respective national GHG inventories based on tier 1 approaches.

The livestock sector is the largest source of anthropogenic methane emissions, and is projected to increase in the future with increased demand for livestock products. Here, we compare livestock methane emissions and emission intensities, defined by the amount of methane emitted per unit of animal proteins, estimated by different methodologies, and identify mitigation potentials in different regions of the world based on possible future projections. We show that emission intensity decreased for most livestock categories globally during 2000-2018, due to an increasing protein-production efficiency, and the IPCC Tier 2 method should be used for capturing the temporal changes in the emission intensities. We further show that efforts on the demand-side to promote balanced, healthy and environmentally-sustainable diets in most countries will not be sufficient to mitigate livestock methane emissions without parallel efforts to improve production efficiency. The latter efforts have much greater mitigating effects than demand-side efforts, and hence should be prioritized in a few developing countries that contribute most of the mitigation potential.