Fabian Watermeyer

and 6 more

Objective: Metamizole is quite an old drug with analgesic, antipyretic and spasmolytic properties. Recent findings have shown that it may induce several cytochrome P450 enzymes, especially CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. The clinical relevance of these properties is uncertain. We aimed to unravel potential pharmacokinetic interactions between metamizole and the CYP3A4 substrate quetiapine. Methods: Plasma concentrations of quetiapine from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database were analyzed. Two groups of 33 patients, either receiving quetiapine as a monotherapy (without CYP modulating co-medications) or with concomitantly applied metamizole were compared addressing a potential impact of metamizole on the metabolism of quetiapine being reflected in differences of plasma concentrations of quetiapine and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D). Results: Patients co-medicated with metamizole showed significantly lower plasma concentrations of quetiapine (median 45.2 ng/mL, Q1=15.5; Q3=90.5 vs. 92.0 ng/mL, Q1=52.3; Q3=203.8, p=0.003). Accordingly, plasma concentrations of quetiapine in the control group were more than twice of those in the metamizole group (+103% higher). The dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were 69 % lower in the co-medication group (p=0.001). Conclusions: The combination of metamizole and quetiapine leads to significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, most likely via an induction of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 by metamizole. Clinicians have to consider the risk of adverse drug reactions, especially treatment failure under quetiapine when adding metamizole.

Teresa Margraff

and 5 more

Fabian Watermeyer

and 6 more

Objective: Metamizole is quite an old drug with analgesic, antipyretic and spasmolytic properties. Recent findings have shown that it may induce several cytochrome P450 enzymes, especially CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. The clinical relevance of these properties is uncertain. We aimed to unravel potential pharmacokinetic interactions between metamizole and the CYP3A4 substrate quetiapine. Methods: Plasma concentrations of quetiapine from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database were analyzed. Two groups of 33 patients, either receiving quetiapine as a monotherapy (without CYP modulating co-medications) or with concomitantly applied metamizole were compared addressing a potential impact of metamizole on the metabolism of quetiapine being reflected in differences of plasma concentrations of quetiapine and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D). Results: Patients co-medicated with metamizole showed significantly lower plasma concentrations of quetiapine (median 45.2 ng/mL, Q1=15.5; Q3=90.5 vs. 92.0 ng/mL, Q1=52.3; Q3=203.8, p=0.003). Accordingly, plasma concentrations of quetiapine in the control group were more than twice of those in the metamizole group (+103% higher). The dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were 69 % lower in the co-medication group (p=0.001). Conclusions: The combination of metamizole and quetiapine leads to significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, most likely via an induction of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 by metamizole. Clinicians have to consider the risk of adverse drug reactions, especially treatment failure under quetiapine when adding metamizole.
Aim: Augmentation of antipsychotic treatment with antidepressants represents a common and beneficial treatment strategy in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Combining clozapine and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline represents a clinically important strategy, but there is limited knowledge about mutual pharmacokinetic interactions. In the present study, we assessed the impact of clozapine on sertraline plasma concentrations. Methods: Based on a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database, sertraline plasma concentrations were compared between two groups: patients receiving a combined treatment with sertraline and clozapine (SERTCLZ; N=15) and a matched control group receiving sertraline but no clozapine (SERT; N=17). Group differences with respect to raw and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were assessed using non-parametric tests. Results: No significant differences were found between the groups regarding daily dosage of sertraline, age, weight, sex distribution, and caffeine or nicotine consumption (all p-values >0.05). Co-medication with clozapine was associated with 67% lower median sertraline plasma concentrations (16 vs. 48 ng/mL; p=0.022) and 28% lower median dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D; 0.21 vs. 0.29 (ng/mL) / (mg/day); p=0.049) as compared to the control group. Conclusion: When applying a combined treatment with clozapine and sertraline, clinicians should consider therapeutic drug monitoring to confirm therapeutically effective plasma concentrations of sertraline.