Background We explored whether hospital-based surveillance is useful in detecting severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) clusters and how often these events result in outbreak investigation and community mitigation. Methods During May 2009– December 2020, physicians at 14 sentinel hospitals prospectively identified SARI clusters (i.e., ≥2 SARI cases who developed symptoms ≤10 days of each other and lived <30 minute walk or <3 km from each other). Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for influenza and other respiratory viruses by rRT-PCR. We describe the demographic of persons within clusters, laboratory results, and outbreak investigations. Results Physicians identified 464 clusters comprising 1,427 SARI cases (range 0–13 clusters per month). Sixty percent of clusters had three, 23% had 2, and 17% had ≥4 cases. Their median age was 2 years (interquartile [IQR] 0.4–25) and 63% were male. Laboratory results were available for the 464 clusters a median 9 days (IQR = 6–13 days) after cluster identification. Less than one in five clusters had cases that tested positive for the same virus: RSV in 58 (13%), influenza viruses in 24 (5%), HMPV in 5 (1%), HPIV in 3 (0.6%), adenovirus in 2 (0.4%). While 102/464 (22%) had poultry exposure, none tested positive for influenza A(H5N1) or A(H7N9). None of the 464 clusters led to field deployments for outbreak response. Conclusions For 11 years, none of the hundreds of identified clusters led to emergency response. The value of this event-based surveillance might be improved by seeking larger clusters, with stronger epidemiologic ties or decedents.
