Natalie J Burls

and 23 more

The Miocene epoch, spanning 23.03-5.33Ma, was a dynamic climate of sustained, polar amplified warmth. Miocene atmospheric CO2 concentrations are typically reconstructed between 300-600ppm and were potentially higher during the Miocene Climatic Optimum (16.75-14.5Ma). With surface temperature reconstructions pointing to substantial midlatitude and polar warmth, it is unclear what processes maintained the much weaker-than-modern equator-to-pole temperature difference. Here we synthesize several Miocene climate modeling efforts together with available terrestrial and ocean surface temperature reconstructions. We evaluate the range of model-data agreement, highlight robust mechanisms operating across Miocene modelling efforts, and regions where differences across experiments result in a large spread in warming responses. Prescribed CO2 is the primary factor controlling global warming across the ensemble. On average, elements other than CO2, such as Miocene paleogeography and ice sheets, raise global mean temperature by ~ 2℃, with the spread in warming under a given CO2 concentration (due to a combination of the spread in imposed boundary conditions and climate feedback strengths) equivalent to ~1.2 times a CO2 doubling. This study uses an ensemble of opportunity: models, boundary conditions, and reference datasets represent the state-of-art for the Miocene, but are inhomogeneous and not ideal for a formal intermodel comparison effort. Acknowledging this caveat, this study is nevertheless the first Miocene multi-model, multi-proxy comparison attempted so far. This study serves to take stock of the current progress towards simulating Miocene warmth while isolating remaining challenges that may be well served by community-led efforts to coordinate modelling and data activities within a common analysis framework.

Shizhu Wang

and 4 more

In this paper we assessed the representation of Arctic sea surface salinity (SSS) and liquid freshwater content (FWC) in the historical simulation of 31 CMIP6 models with comparison to 39 CMIP5 models, and investigated the projected changes in Arctic liquid FWC and freshwater budget in two scenarios (SSP245 and SSP585) of the CMIP6 models. While CMIP6 multi-model mean (MMM) shows an amelioration in representing Arctic SSS compared to CMIP5, no significant reduction is found in the overestimation of FWC and overall model spreads of future changes of Arctic freshwater budget. CMIP6 MMM projects a SSS decrease in most parts of the Arctic Ocean, a slight SSS increase in the Eurasian Basin, and the strongest increase in FWC along the periphery of the Arctic Basin. In the historical simulation, the MMM river runoff, net precipitation, Bering Strait and Barents Sea Opening freshwater transports are 93±34 mSv, 58±109 mSv, 80±32 mSv, and -20±17 mSv, respectively. In the last decade of the 21st century, these budget terms will increase to 138±47 mSv, 123±93 mSv, 83±35 mSv, and 33±47 mSv in the SSP585 scenario. Sea ice meltwater flux will decrease to about zero in the mid-21st century in both SSP245 and SSP585. Freshwater exports through Fram and Davis straits will be higher in the future, and the Fram Strait export will remain larger. The Arctic Ocean is projected to hold a total of 160,300±62,330 km3 freshwater in the SSP585 scenario by 2100, about 60% more than its historical climatology.
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is one of the most essential mechanisms influencing our climate system. By comparing constant depth (z-AMOC) and density (ρ-AMOC) frameworks under pre-industrial, historical and abrupt 4xCO2 scenarios we analyze how the circulation mean state and variability differ amongst them. Water mass transformations are also assessed as a matter of analyzing surface-induced and interior-mixing-induced transformations. As expected, both location and strength of AMOC maxima are deeply affected by the framework choice, with the AMOC reaching a maximum transport of 21 Sv at around 35°N under constant depth coordinates, as opposed to ∼25 Sv at 55°N when diagnosed from density surfaces for both pre-industrial and historical climate. When quadrupling the CO2, both frameworks exhibit an abrupt AMOC weakening followed by a steady recovery to maximum values of 10-15 Sv. The z-AMOC maxima timeseries correlates more with those at 26°N (r ∼0.7) than with the ρ-AMOC maxima (r ∼-0.3), due to the flatter isopycnals in the z framework even in the subpolar North Atlantic, where isopycnals are, in fact, steeper. Based on this discrepancy, we argue that the density framework is more coherent to the physics of this circulation by directly incorporating water mass transformations and their density structure. We suggest that more analysis across timescales and under different conditions must be performed with density surface outputs being provided by as many models as possible, to enable a more comprehensive analysis of these two frameworks and their applications.