loading page

Comparing the importance of iodine and isoprene on tropospheric photochemistry
  • Ryan J Pound,
  • Mathew J. Evans,
  • Lucy J. Carpenter
Ryan J Pound
University of York

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Mathew J. Evans
University of York
Author Profile
Lucy J. Carpenter
University of York, UK
Author Profile

Abstract

Naturally emitted reactive trace gases are thought to impact tropospheric composition, predominantly through the emission and chemistry of isoprene (C5H8). Other species are thought to play a less important role. Here the GEOS-Chem model is used to compare the impacts of isoprene and iodine emissions on present-day tropospheric composition. Removing isoprene emissions leads to a 4.4% decrease in tropospheric O3 burden, a smaller absolute change than the 5.7% increase from removing iodine emissions. Iodine has a negligible impact on global mean OH concentrations and methane lifetime (-0.2% and +0.1%). Isoprene has a substantial impact on both (-7% and +6.5%). Isoprene emissions and chemistry are seen as essential for tropospheric chemistry models, but iodine is often not. We suggest iodine should receive greater attention in model development and experimental research to allow improved predictions of past, present and future tropospheric O3.