Questions Relating to KARNA (KELEA Assisted Restoration of
Nature’s Allostasis)
- What are the relative contributions, optimal amounts, and ideal
proportionality of the three components currently being utilized? The
relatively small amounts being used may have the intrinsic benefit of
allowing the biological restoration process to proceed more
sequentially. Restoration could begin with the selective growth of
beneficial microbes that may outcompete pathogenic microbes. Next may
be the flourishing of microinvertebrates, followed in turn by
macroinvertebrates, and invertebrates. Such a progression would
emulate evolution. Ways are available to quantify such sequential
life-form changes in treated areas. Moreover, studies are likely to
reveal previously unknown biological interactions and sensing
mechanisms operating within complex ecosystems.
- What is the mode of action of each effective component? Details are
needed on the precise mechanisms of water activation using Kiko
pellets, other dipolar materials, and fluctuating electrical charges.
The proposed existence of KELEA as a discrete natural life force
energy needs to be confirmed. The potential role of telluric currents
in the activation of Kiko pellets is currently under investigation. So
too is the possible relationship of electroculture and magnetoculture
technologies to KELEA activation of water [16].
- Can the effectiveness of the manufactured components be improved in
economically beneficial ways, augmented, or replaced using other means
of KELEA activation of water?
- What is the timeline of the induced beneficial biological changes and
what is the influence of specific forms of chemical and/or biological
contamination on the emergence and temporary excesses of restorative
biological agents? Precise laboratory monitoring of chemical and
biological changes throughout the restoration process will yield
useful information.
- Can some of the observed biological changes be used to expedite
remediation in other polluted waterways? Of particular interest will
be characterizing microbes with specific catalytic abilities to
degrade toxic synthetic chemicals.
- Reminiscent of the Beauchamp/Pasteur debates [17], is the growth
of invasive species due primarily to their presence or secondary to a
disorder within the ecosystem due to other factors? If the latter,
then intensive quarantine efforts may be unnecessary.
- Can secondary benefits be shown, for example in farming and certain
industrial processes, from the pollution reduction in water?
Certainly, the benefits will extend to improved human and animal
health. They will also increase outdoor enjoyment and shoreline
property values.
- What are the limits of Nature’s allostasis even using maximal
achievable KELEA levels?
- Do the same Nature allostasis principles apply to reducing soil and
air pollution and to improving human and animal health? Specific
benefits of using Kiko pellets in large-scale rice and sugarcane
production have been described [18-19].
- What are the implications of KELEA in other areas of basic science,
including basic physics, chemistry, climate, and cosmology?
None of these questions need to be answered before the existing protocol
can be employed in treating virtually all the world’s polluted inland
waterways. It is suggested that specific applications be compiled for
public sharing. The concept of Nature’s allostasis should be conveyed in
educational programs, including those aimed at educating students.
Regulations should be in place to limit pollution to within the
augmented range of Nature’s allostasis.