\documentclass[10pt]{article}

\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\usepackage[section]{placeins}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{breakcites}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{hyphenat}





\PassOptionsToPackage{hyphens}{url}
\usepackage[colorlinks = true,
            linkcolor = blue,
            urlcolor  = blue,
            citecolor = blue,
            anchorcolor = blue]{hyperref}
\usepackage{etoolbox}
\makeatletter
\patchcmd\@combinedblfloats{\box\@outputbox}{\unvbox\@outputbox}{}{%
  \errmessage{\noexpand\@combinedblfloats could not be patched}%
}%
\makeatother


\usepackage{natbib}




\renewenvironment{abstract}
  {{\bfseries\noindent{\abstractname}\par\nobreak}\footnotesize}
  {\bigskip}

\titlespacing{\section}{0pt}{*3}{*1}
\titlespacing{\subsection}{0pt}{*2}{*0.5}
\titlespacing{\subsubsection}{0pt}{*1.5}{0pt}


\usepackage{authblk}


\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[space]{grffile}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{booktabs,array,multirow}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amssymb}
\providecommand\citet{\cite}
\providecommand\citep{\cite}
\providecommand\citealt{\cite}
% You can conditionalize code for latexml or normal latex using this.
\newif\iflatexml\latexmlfalse
\providecommand{\tightlist}{\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}}%

\AtBeginDocument{\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.pdf,.PDF,.eps,.EPS,.png,.PNG,.tif,.TIF,.jpg,.JPG,.jpeg,.JPEG}}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ngerman,polish,english]{babel}



\usepackage{float}








\begin{document}

\title{Evidence for Low-Pressure Crustal Anatexis During the Northeast Atlantic
Break-up}



\author[1]{Ashley Mae Morris}%
\author[1]{Sarah Lambart}%
\author[2]{Michael Andrew Stearns}%
\author[3]{John Bowman}%
\author[4]{Morgan T Jones}%
\author[5]{Geoffroy MOHN}%
\author[6]{Graham Andrews}%
\author[7]{John Michael Millet}%
\author[8]{Christian Tegner}%
\author[9]{Sayantani Chatterjee}%
\author[10]{Joost Frieling}%
\author[11]{Pengyuan Guo}%
\author[12]{Christian Berndt}%
\author[13]{Sverre Planke}%
\author[14]{Carlos Andres Alvarez-Zarikian}%
\author[15]{Peter Betlem}%
\author[16]{Henk Brinkhuis}%
\author[17]{Marilena Christopoulou}%
\author[18]{Eric C. Ferré}%
\author[19]{Irina Filina}%
\author[1]{Dustin T. Harper}%
\author[20]{David Jolley}%
\author[21]{Jack Longman}%
\author[17]{Reed Scherer}%
\author[22]{Natalia Varela}%
\author[23]{Weimu Xu}%
\author[24]{Stacy L Yager}%
\author[25]{Amar Agarwal}%
\author[26]{Vincent J Clementi}%
\affil[1]{University of Utah}%
\affil[2]{Utah Valley University}%
\affil[3]{Unknown}%
\affil[4]{Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics}%
\affil[5]{CY Cergy Paris Université}%
\affil[6]{University of Hull}%
\affil[7]{Volcanic Basin Energy Research}%
\affil[8]{Aarhus University}%
\affil[9]{Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University,}%
\affil[10]{Utrecht University}%
\affil[11]{Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences}%
\affil[12]{GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel}%
\affil[13]{University of Oslo}%
\affil[14]{Texas A\&M University}%
\affil[15]{University Centre in Svalbard}%
\affil[16]{Royal NIOZ}%
\affil[17]{Northern Illinois University}%
\affil[18]{University of Louisiana at Lafayette}%
\affil[19]{Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, USA}%
\affil[20]{University of Aberdeen}%
\affil[21]{Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Northumbria}%
\affil[22]{Virginia Tech}%
\affil[23]{University College Dublin}%
\affil[24]{Ball State University}%
\affil[25]{Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur, Kanpur, 208016}%
\affil[26]{Rutgers University}%


\vspace{-1em}



  
  \date{May 18, 2024}


\begingroup
\let\center\flushleft
\let\endcenter\endflushleft
\maketitle
\endgroup





\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{abstract}
While basaltic volcanism is dominate during rifting and continental
breakup, felsic magmatism may also comprise important components of some
rift margins. During International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP)
Expedition 396 on the continental margin of Norway, a
graphite-garnet-cordierite bearing dacitic, pyroclastic unit was
recovered within early Eocene sediments on Mimir High (Site U1570), a
marginal high on the V\selectlanguage{ngerman}øring transform margin. Here, we present a
comprehensive textural, mineralogical, and petrological study of the
dacite in order to assess its melting origin and emplacement. The major
mineral phases (garnet, cordierite, quartz, plagioclase, alkali
feldspar) are hosted in a fresh rhyolitic, highly vesicular, glassy
matrix, locally mingled with sediments. The xenocrystic major element
chemistry of garnet and cordierite, the presence of zircon inclusions
with inherited cores, and thermobarometric calculations all support a
crustal metapelite origin. While most magma-rich margin models favor
crustal anatexis in the lower crust, thermobarometric calculations
performed here show that the dacite was produced at upper-crustal depths
(\textless{} 5 kbar) and high temperature (750--800 °C) with up to 3
wt\% water content. In situ U-Pb analyses on zircon inclusions give a
magmatic age of 54.6 ± 1.1 Ma, revealing the emplacement of the dacite
post-dates the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM). Our results
suggest that the opening of the North Atlantic was associated with a
phase of low-pressure, high-temperature crustal melting at the onset of
the main phase of magmatism.%
\end{abstract}\selectlanguage{ngerman}%



\sloppy


\selectlanguage{english}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\normalsize\begin{tabulary}{1.0\textwidth}{CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC}
\textbf{Table S1.} Composition, reproducibility and accuracy of the
secondary standards during LA-ICP-MS and LASS analytical sessions.
 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
 & Session 1\textsuperscript{a}
 &  &  & Session 2\textsuperscript{a}
 &  &  &  &  & Session 3\textsuperscript{a} (LASS)
 &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
 & BHVO-2g GeoReM Values\textsuperscript{\textbf{b}}
 & Average Measured (n=10) & Relative Error (\%) & NIST612 GeoReM Values\textsuperscript{\textbf{c}}
 & Average Measured (n=11) & Relative Error (\%) & SCO NMNH 111312/42\textsuperscript{\textbf{d}}
 & Average Measured (n=6) & 91500 Prefered values\textsuperscript{\textbf{e}}
 & Average Measured (n=22) & Relative Error (\%) & Ple\selectlanguage{polish}š\selectlanguage{english}ovice\textsuperscript{\textbf{f}}
 & Average Measured (n=20) & GJ-1\textsuperscript{\textbf{g}}
 & Average Measured (n=59) \\
Li &  &  &  & 40 & 43.73 & 9.32 & 1.47 (49) & 2.18 (47) &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
P &  &  &  &  &  &  & 24.2 (41) & 27.1 (79) & 24 & 30 & 20 &  &  & 25.2-50.1 & 36 \\
Sc & 33 & 26.8 & 18.8 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Ti & 16300 & 15103.32 & 7.34 & 43 & 40.13 & 6.68 & 23.1 (54) & 18.6 (31) & 6 & 4 & 33 &  &  & 3.3-3280 & 3.5 \\
V & 308 & 315.6 & 2.47 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.04-0.05 & <DL & - &  &  &  &  \\
Cr & 293 & 281.42 & 3.95 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Co & 44 & 43.8 & 0.47 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Zn & 102 & 122.8 & 20.39 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Ga & 22 & 20.96 & 4.74 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Ge & 1.6 & 1.48 & 7.6 & 37 & 41.48 & 12.1 & 1.41 (62) & 0.71 (25) &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Rb &  &  &  & 33 & 35.83 & 8.57 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Sr & 396 & 353.54 & 10.72 & 77 & 77.92 & 1.19 &  &  & 0.05 & <DL & - &  &  & 0.2 & 0.2 \\
Y & 26 & 18.34 & 29.44 &  &  &  &  &  & 140 & 136 & 2.8 & 139-532 & 396 & 181-307 & 241 \\
Zr & 170 & 127.97 & 24.72 & 38 & 38.73 & 1.92 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
Ba &  &  &  & 39 & 40.85 & 4.75 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
La & 15.2 & 13.07 & 14.02 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.01 & <DL & - & 0.18-1.5 & 0.15 & 0.0-2.01 & 0.1 \\
Ce & 37.6 & 33.78 & 10.16 &  &  &  &  &  & 2.6 & 2.5 & 3.8 & 0.93-9.8 & 2.5 & 10.4-20.6 & 15.7 \\
Nb &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  & 0.79 & 0.79 & 0 & 0.17-3.2 & 4.2 & 1.17-3 & 1.5 \\
Pr & 5.35 & 4.61 & 13.78 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.02 & <DL & - & 0.13-1.7 & 0.16 & 0.03-0.52 & <DL \\
Nd & 24.5 & 20.87 & 14.82 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.24 & 0.29 & 17.2 & 0.97-11.9 & 1.5 & 0.36-1.07 & 0.6 \\
Sm & 6.1 & 5.03 & 17.59 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.5 & 0.51 & 2 & 2.1-11.7 & 3.1 & 0.84-1.82 & 1.4 \\
Eu & 2.07 & 1.7 & 17.98 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.24 & 0.36 & 33.3 & 0.26-3.1 & 0.8 & 0.78-1.3 & 1 \\
Gd & 6.16 & 4.45 & 27.8 &  &  &  &  &  & 2.2 & 2.4 & 8.33 & 7-32 & 11.6 & 4.1-9.1 & 6.7 \\
Tb & 0.92 & 0.67 & 27.19 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.86 & 0.9 & 4.44 & 2.9-11.2 & 3.9 & 1.42-2.5 & 1.9 \\
Dy & 5.28 & 4.05 & 23.39 &  &  &  &  &  & 12 & 11 & 8.3 & 28-121 & 42 & 14.7-26 & 19.5 \\
Ho & 0.98 & 0.72 & 26.35 &  &  &  &  &  & 4.8 & 4.5 & 6.3 & 8-35 & 12 & 5.1-27.4 & 6.7 \\
Er & 2.56 & 1.82 & 28.9 &  &  &  &  &  & 25 & 24.3 & 2.8 & 27-123 & 41 & 7.4-38 & 28.7 \\
Tm &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  & 5.95-6.89 & 6.1 & - & 5-24 & 7.3 & 4.7-89.3 & 6.1 \\
Yb & 2.01 & 1.44 & 28.61 &  &  &  &  &  & 74 & 65 & 12.2 & 38-185 & 10.3-76 & 61 & 60.8 \\
Lu & 0.28 & 0.22 & 21.39 &  &  &  &  &  & 13 & 13.5 & 3.85 & 4.6-23 & 7.9 & 11.8 & 12.8 \\
Hf & 4.32 & 3.16 & 26.84 &  &  &  &  &  & 5900 & 5300 & 10.2 & 9477-14431 & 10852 & 6558 & 6425 \\
Ta & 1.15 & 0.8 & 30.55 &  &  &  &  &  & 0.5 & 0.56 & 12.0 &  &  & 0.28-0.5 & 0.5 \\
Th & 1.22 & 1.01 & 17.46 &  &  &  &  &  & 30 & 27 & 10 & 44-183 & 68 & 6.67-19 & 9.3 \\
U & 0.4 & 0.37 & 7.89 &  &  &  &  &  & 80 & 83 & 3.61 & 465-1106 & 666 & 280 & 281 \\
207\textbf{Pb/}\textsuperscript{\textbf{235}}\textbf{U}
 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  & 1.25\selectlanguage{ngerman} - 2.04 & 1.85 & - & 0.39  & 0.39 &  &  \\
206\textbf{Pb/}\textsuperscript{\textbf{238}}\textbf{U}
 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  & 0.18 & 0.18 & 1.12 &  0.05 & 0.05 & 0.1 - 0.1 & 0.1 \\
207\textbf{Pb/}\textsuperscript{\textbf{206}}\textbf{Pb}
 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  & 0.05 - 1.82  & 0.08 & - &  0.05 - 0.56 & 0.05 & 0.06 & 0.06 \\
\textsuperscript{a}BHVO-2g was used as a secondary standard during
session 1 (garnet, cordierite, plagioclase and alkali feldspar
analyses). NIST612 was used as a secondary standard during session 2
(quartz analyses). 91500, Ple\selectlanguage{polish}š\selectlanguage{english}ovice and GJ-1 zircons were used as
secondary standards in session 3 (zircons).
 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
\textsuperscript{b}Jochum et al. (2009); cJochum et al. (2011).;
\textsuperscript{d}Lambart et al. (2022); \textsuperscript{e}GeoREM HMM
91500ZIRCON Prefered Values; \textsuperscript{f}range reported by
\textsuperscript{} Sl\selectlanguage{ngerman}áma et al. (2008) for pristine zircon
domains;\textsuperscript{g}values reported in GeoREM except for Lu and
Hf (Morel et al., 2008)
 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
For SCO,  the number in parentheses is the two standard deviation and is given in terms of the least unit cited (e.g, 1.47 (49) represents 1.47 \selectlanguage{ngerman}± 0.49 ppm).  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\
\end{tabulary}
\caption{{This is a caption
{\label{681637}}%
}}
\end{table}

\selectlanguage{english}
\FloatBarrier
\end{document}

