REFERENCE LIST
Aase, K., Jensen, H. & Muff, S. (2022). Genomic estimation of quantitative genetic parameters in wild admixed populations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 1014–1026.
Adams, J.R., Vucetich, L.M., Hedrick, P.W., Peterson, R.O. & Vucetich, J.A. (2011). Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 3336–3344.
Åkesson, M., Liberg, O., Sand, H., Wabakken, P., Bensch, S. & Flagstad, Ø. (2016). Genetic rescue in a severely inbred wolf population. Molecular Ecology, 25, 4745–4756.
Allendorf, F., Leary, R., Hitt, N., Knudsen, K., Lundquist, L. & Spruell, P. (2004). Intercrosses and the US Endangered Species Act: Should hybridized populations be included as Westslope cutthroat trout? Conservation Biology, 18, 1203–1213.
Armbruster, P., Bradshaw, W.E. & Holzapfel, C.M. (1997). Evolution of the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution, 51, 451–458.
Atsumi, K., Lagisz, M. & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Nonadditive genetic effects induce novel phenotypic distributions in male mating traits of F1 hybrids. Evolution, 75, 1304–1315.
Barker, B.S., Cocio, J.E., Anderson, S.R., Braasch, J.E., Cang, F.A., Gillette, H.D., et al. (2019). Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology, 28, 100–113.
Barnard-Kubow, K.B. & Galloway, L.F. (2017). Variation in reproductive isolation across a species range. Ecology and Evolution.
Barnard-Kubow, K.B., McCoy, M.A. & Galloway, L.F. (2017). Biparental chloroplast inheritance leads to rescue from cytonuclear incompatibility. New Phytologist, 213, 1466–1476.
Barnard-Kubow, K.B., So, N. & Galloway, L.F. (2016). Cytonuclear incompatibility contributes to the early stages of speciation. Evolution.
Barton, N. (2001). The role of hybridization in evolution. Molecular Ecology, 10, 551–568.
Bell, G. (2017). Evolutionary Rescue. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 48, 605–627.
Boeven, P.H.G., Zhao, Y., Thorwarth, P., Liu, F., Maurer, H.P., Gils, M., et al. (2020). Negative dominance and dominance-by-dominance epistatic effects reduce grain-yield heterosis in wide crosses in wheat. Science Advances, 6, eaay4897.
Bolnick, D.I. & Nosil, P. (2007). Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load. Evolution, 61, 2229–2243.
Brice, C., Zhang, Z., Bendixsen, D. & Stelkens, R. (2021). Hybridization outcomes have strong genomic and environmental contingencies. The American Naturalist, E000–E000.
Buerkle, C.A. (2005). Maximum-likelihood estimation of a hybrid index based on molecular markers. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 684–687.
Bull, J.K. & Sunnucks, P. (2014). Strong genetic structuring without assortative mating or reduced hybrid survival in an onychophoran in the Tallaganda State Forest region, Australia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 111, 589–602.
Burke, J.M. & Arnold, M.L. (2001). Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annual Review of Genetics, 35, 31–52.
Burton, R.S., Ellison, C.K. & Harrison, J.S. (2006). The sorry state of f2 hybrids: consequences of rapid mitochondrial dna evolution in allopatric populations. The American Naturalist, 168, S14–S24.
Carroll, S.P., Dingle, H. & Famula, T.R. (2003). Rapid appearance of epistasis during adaptive divergence following colonization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, S80–S83.
Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J.H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet, 10, 783–796.
Chevin, L.-M., Decorzent, G. & Lenormand, T. (2014). Niche dimensionality and the genetics of ecological speciation. Evolution, 68, 1244–1256.
Clutton-Brock, T. (n.d.). Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology.
Cockerham, C.C. (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics, 39, 859–882.
Connallon, T. & Chenoweth, S.F. (2019). Dominance reversals and the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness. PLOS Biology, 17, e3000118.
Crow, J.F. (1948). Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics, 33, 477–487.
Crow, J.F. (1987). Muller, Dobzhansky, and overdominance. Journal of the History of Biology, 20, 351–380.
Dagilis, A.J., Kirkpatrick, M. & Bolnick, D.I. (2019). The evolution of hybrid fitness during speciation. PLOS Genetics.
Darwin, C.R. (1876). The effects of cross and self-fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London.
De Lisle, S.P., Goedert, D., Reedy, A.M. & Svensson, E.I. (2018). Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170415.
Demuth, J. & Wade, M. (2005). On the theoretical and empirical framework for studying genetic interactions within and among species. The American Naturalist.
Derry, A.M., Fraser, D.J., Brady, S.P., Astorg, L., Lawrence, E.R., Martin, G.K., et al. (2019). Conservation through the lens of (mal)adaptation: Concepts and meta-analysis. Evolutionary Applications, 12, 1287–1304.
Dobzhansky, T. (1950). Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 35, 288–302.
Edelaar, P. & Bolnick, D.I. (2012). Non-random gene flow: An underappreciated force in evolution and ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 659–665.
Edelman, N.B. & Mallet, J. (2021). Prevalence and adaptive impact of introgression. Annual Review of Genetics, 55, 265–283.
Edmands, S. (2007). Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol, 16, 463–475.
Edmands, S. & Deimler, J. (2004). Local adaptation, intrinsic coadaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpopulation hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 303, 183–196.
Ellstrand, N.C. (2014). Is gene flow the most important evolutionary force in plants? American Journal of Botany, 101, 737–753.
Fenster, C.B. (1991). Gene Flow in Chamaecrista Fasciculata (leguminosae) II. Gene Establishment. Evolution, 45, 410–422.
Fenster, C.B., Galloway, L.F. & Chao, L. (1997). Epistasis and its consequences for the evolution of natural populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12, 282–286.
Fiévet, J.B., Dillmann, C. & de Vienne, D. (2010). Systemic properties of metabolic networks lead to an epistasis-based model for heterosis. Theor Appl Genet, 120, 463–473.
Fiévet, J.B., Nidelet, T., Dillmann, C. & de Vienne, D. (2018). Heterosis is a systemic property emerging from non-linear genotype-phenotype relationships: evidence from in vitro genetics and computer simulations. Frontiers in Genetics.
Fitzpatrick, S.W., Gerberich, J.C., Angeloni, L.M., Bailey, L.L., Broder, E.D., Torres-Dowdall, J., et al. (2016). Gene flow from an adaptively divergent source causes rescue through genetic and demographic factors in two wild populations of Trinidadian guppies. Evolutionary Applications, 9, 879–891.
Fox, C.W., Stillwell, R.C., Amarillo-S, A.R., Czesak, M.E. & Messina, F.J. (2004). Genetic architecture of population differences in oviposition behaviour of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 1141–1151.
Frankham, R. (2015). Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Molecular Ecology, 24, 2610–2618.
Frankham, R. (2016). Genetic rescue benefits persist to at least the F3 generation, based on a meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 195, 33–36.
Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Eldridge, M.D.B., Lacy, R.C., Ralls, K., Dudash, M.R., et al. (2011). Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol, 25, 465–475.
Fu, D., Xiao, M., Hayward, A., Jiang, G., Zhu, L., Zhou, Q., et al. (2015). What is crop heterosis: new insights into an old topic. J Appl Genetics, 56, 1–13.
García-Ramos, G. & Kirkpatrick, M. (1997). Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution, 51, 21–28.
Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. (2010). Conspecific versus heterospecific gene exchange between populations of Darwin’s finches. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 1065–1076.
Guo, T., Yang, N., Tong, H., Pan, Q., Yang, X., Tang, J., et al. (2014). Genetic basis of grain yield heterosis in an “immortalized F2” maize population. Theor Appl Genet, 127, 2149–2158.
Hayes, H.K. (1946). Yield genes, heterosis and combining ability. The American Naturalist, 80, 430–445.
Hendry, A.P., Gotanda, K.M. & Svensson, E.I. (2017). Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160028.
Hereford, J. (2009). A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade‐offs. The American Naturalist, 173, 579–588.
Hoffmann, A.A., Miller, A.D. & Weeks, A.R. (2021). Genetic mixing for population management: From genetic rescue to provenancing. Evolutionary Applications, 14, 634–652.
Hughes, K.W. & Vickery, R.K. (1974). Patterns of heterosis and crossing barriers resulting from increasing genetic distance between populations of theMimulus luteus complex. J Genet, 61, 235–245.
Ingvarsson, P. & Whitlock, M. (2000). Heterosis increases the effective migration rate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267, 1321–1326.
Ingvarsson, P.K. (2001). Restoration of genetic variation lost – the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 62–63.
Johnson, M.T.J. & Munshi-South, J. (2017). Evolution of life in urban environments. Science, 358, eaam8327.
Kawecki, T. & Ebert, D. (2004). Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters, 7, 1225–1241.
Kimura, M. (1962). On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics, 47, 713–719.
Koski, M.H., Layman, N.C., Prior, C.J., Busch, J.W. & Galloway, L.F. (2019). Selfing ability and drift load evolve with range expansion. Evolution Letters.
Kottler, E.J., Dickman, E.E., Sexton, J.P., Emery, N.C. & Franks, S.J. (2021). Draining the Swamping Hypothesis: Little Evidence that Gene Flow Reduces Fitness at Range Edges. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36, 533–544.
Kuismin, M., Saatoglu, D., Niskanen, A.K., Jensen, H. & Sillanpää, M.J. (2020). Genetic assignment of individuals to source populations using network estimation tools. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 333–344.
Kusterer, B., Piepho, H.-P., Utz, H.F., Schön, C.C., Muminovic, J., Meyer, R.C., et al. (2007). Heterosis for biomass-related traits in arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics, 177, 1839–1850.
Lamkey, K.R. & Edwards, J.W. (1999). Ch. 4- Quantitative Genetics of Heterosis. In: Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 31–48.
Leimu, R. & Fischer, M. (2008). A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLOS ONE, 3, e4010.
Lenormand, T. (2002). Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 183–189.
Lowe, W.H., Kovach, R.P. & Allendorf, F.W. (2017). Population genetics and demography unite ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 141–152.
Lynch, M. (1991). The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution, 45, 622–629.
Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and Analyses of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Massachusetts, USA.
Marr, A., Keller, L. & Arcese, P. (2002). Heterosis and outbreeding depression in descendants of natural immigrants to an inbred population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution, 56, 131–142.
Martinig, A.R., McAdam, A.G., Dantzer, B., Lane, J.E., Coltman, D.W. & Boutin, S. (2020). The new kid on the block: immigrant males win big whereas females pay fitness cost after dispersal. Ecol Lett, 23, 430–438.
Mather, K. & Jinks, J.L. (1982). Introduction to Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London.
Matsubayashi, K.W., Kahono, S. & Katakura, H. (2011). Divergent host plant specialization as the critical driving force in speciation between populations of a phytophagous ladybird beetle. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 1421–1432.
Miles, L.S., Rivkin, L.R., Johnson, M.T.J., Munshi-South, J. & Verrelli, B.C. (2019). Gene flow and genetic drift in urban environments. Molecular Ecology, 28, 4138–4151.
Miller, J.M., Poissant, J., Hogg, J.T. & Coltman, D.W. (2012). Genomic consequences of genetic rescue in an insular population of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Molecular Ecology.
Millon, A., Lambin, X., Devillard, S. & Schaub, M. (2019). Quantifying the contribution of immigration to population dynamics: a review of methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals. Biol Rev, 94, 2049–2067.
Orr, H.A. (1995). The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics, 139, 1805–1813.
Ostevik, K.L., Andrew, R.L., Otto, S.P. & Rieseberg, L.H. (2016). Multiple reproductive barriers separate recently diverged sunflower ecotypes. Evolution, 70, 2322–2335.
Otto, S.P. (2018). Adaptation, speciation and extinction in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20182047.
Paul, J.R., Sheth, S.N. & Angert, A.L. (2011). Quantifying the impact of gene flow on phenotype-environment mismatch: a demonstration with the scarlet Monkeyflower Mimulus cardinalis. The American Naturalist, 178, S62–S79.
Pelletier, F. & Coltman, D.W. (2018). Will human influences on evolutionary dynamics in the wild pervade the Anthropocene? BMC Biology, 16, 7.
Pelletier, F., Garant, D. & Hendry, A. p. (2009). Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1483–1489.
Pfennig, A. & Lachance, J. (2022). Hybrid fitness effects modify fixation probabilities of introgressed alleles. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, jkac113.
Pfennig, K.S., Kelly, A.L. & Pierce, A.A. (2016). Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20161329.
Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. (1989). Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution, 43, 1209–1222.
Pickup, M., Field, D.L., Rowell, D.M. & Young, A.G. (2013). Source population characteristics affect heterosis following genetic rescue of fragmented plant populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20122058.
Price, M.V. & Waser, N.M. (1979). Pollen dispersal and optimal outcrossing in Delphinium nelsoni. Nature, 277, 294–297.
Raunsgard, A., Opedal, Ø.H., Ekrem, R.K., Wright, J., Bolstad, G.H., Armbruster, W.S., et al. (2018). Intersexual conflict over seed size is stronger in more outcrossed populations of a mixed-mating plant. PNAS, 115, 11561–11566.
Raynes, Y., Wylie, C.S., Sniegowski, P.D. & Weinreich, D.M. (2018). Sign of selection on mutation rate modifiers depends on population size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 3422–3427.
Reid, J.M., Arcese, P., Nietlisbach, P., Wolak, M.E., Muff, S., Dickel, L., et al. (2021). Immigration counter-acts local micro-evolution of a major fitness component: Migration-selection balance in free-living song sparrows. Evolution Letters, 5, 48–60.
Revardel, E., Franc, A. & Petit, R.J. (2010). Sex-biased dispersal promotes adaptive parental effects. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 217.
Reznick, D.N., Losos, J. & Travis, J. (2019). From low to high gear: there has been a paradigm shift in our understanding of evolution. Ecology Letters, 22, 233–244.
Rhymer, J.M. & Simberloff, D. (1996). Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27, 83–109.
Rieseberg, L.H., Archer, M.A. & Wayne, R.K. (1999). Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity, 83, 363–372.
Rius, M. & Darling, J.A. (2014). How important is intraspecific genetic admixture to the success of colonising populations? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 233–242.
Roff, D.A. & Emerson, K. (2006). Epistasis and dominance: evidence for differential effects in life-history versus morphological traits. Evolution, 60, 1981–1990.
Rundle, H.D. & Whitlock, M.C. (2001). A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution, 55, 198–201.
Runemark, A., Eroukhmanoff, F., Nava-Bolaños, A., Hermansen, J.S. & Meier, J.I. (2018). Hybridization, sex-specific genomic architecture and local adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170419.
Saatoglu, D., Niskanen, A.K., Kuismin, M., Ranke, P.S., Hagen, I.J., Araya-Ajoy, Y.G., et al. (2021). Dispersal in a house sparrow metapopulation: An integrative case study of genetic assignment calibrated with ecological data and pedigree information. Molecular Ecology, 30, 4740–4756.
Saavedra, C. & Amat, F. (2005). Maternal Effects on Encystment in Crosses Between Two Geographic Strains of Artemia franciscana. Journal of Heredity, 96, 713–717.
Schaub, M., Jakober, H. & Stauber, W. (2013). Strong contribution of immigration to local population regulation: evidence from a migratory passerine. Ecology, 94, 1828–1838.
Schneemann, H., De Sanctis, B., Roze, D., Bierne, N. & Welch, J.J. (2020). The geometry and genetics of hybridization. Evolution, 74, 2575–2590.
Shapira, R., Levy, T., Shaked, S., Fridman, E. & David, L. (2014). Extensive heterosis in growth of yeast hybrids is explained by a combination of genetic models. Heredity, 113, 316–326.
Simon, A., Bierne, N. & Welch, J.J. (2018). Coadapted genomes and selection on hybrids: Fisher’s geometric model explains a variety of empirical patterns. Evolution Letters, 2, 472–498.
Soule, M. (1967). Phenetics of natural populations. II. Asymmetry and evolution in a lizard. The American Naturalist, 101, 141–160.
Stephens, P.A. & Sutherland, W.J. (1999). Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 401–405.
Stern, C. (1948). Negative heterosis and decreased effectiveness of alleles in heterozygotes. Genetics.
Stewart, G.S., Morris, M.R., Genis, A.B., Szűcs, M., Melbourne, B.A., Tavener, S.J., et al. (2017). The power of evolutionary rescue is constrained by genetic load. Evolutionary Applications, 10, 731–741.
Sutherland, W.J., Freckleton, R.P., Godfray, H.C.J., Beissinger, S.R., Benton, T., Cameron, D.D., et al. (2013). Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. Journal of Ecology, 101, 58–67.
Svensson, E.I., Goedert, D., Gómez-Llano, M.A., Spagopoulou, F., Nava-Bolaños, A. & Booksmythe, I. (2018). Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170420.
Szucs, M., Melbourne, B.A., Tuff, T. & Hufbauer, R.A. (2014). The roles of demography and genetics in the early stages of colonization. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20141073.
Tallmon, D.A., Luikart, G. & Waples, R.S. (2004). The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 489–496.
Thompson, K.A., Peichel, C.L., Rennison, D.J., McGee, M.D., Albert, A.Y.K., Vines, T.H., et al. (2022). Analysis of ancestry heterozygosity suggests that hybrid incompatibilities in threespine stickleback are environment dependent. PLOS Biology, 20, e3001469.
Trochet, A., Courtois, E.A., Stevens, V.M., Baguette, M., Chaine, A., Schmeller, D.S., et al. (2016). Evolution of sex-biased dispersal. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 91, 297–320.
Vasseur, F., Fouqueau, L., Vienne, D. de, Nidelet, T., Violle, C. & Weigel, D. (2019). Nonlinear phenotypic variation uncovers the emergence of heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Biology, 17, e3000214.
Waser, N.M. & Price, M.V. (1989). Optimal Outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: Seed Set and Offspring Fitness. Evolution, 43, 1097.
Whiteley, A.R., Fitzpatrick, S.W., Funk, W.C. & Tallmon, D.A. (2015). Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30, 42–49.
Whitlock, M., Ingvarsson, P. & Hatfield, T. (2000). Local drift load and the heterosis of interconnected populations. Heredity, 84, 452–457.
Whitlock, R., Stewart, G.B., Goodman, S.J., Piertney, S.B., Butlin, R.K., Pullin, A.S., et al. (2013). A systematic review of phenotypic responses to between-population outbreeding. Environmental Evidence, 2, 13.
Willi, Y. & Van Buskirk, J. (2005). Genomic compatibility occurs over a wide range of parental genetic similarity in an outcrossing plant. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
Willi, Y., Van Kleunen, M., Dietrich, S. & Fischer, M. (2007). Genetic rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2357–2364.
Zavodna, M., Abdelkrim, J., Pellissier, V. & Machon, N. (2015). A long-term genetic study reveals complex population dynamics of multiple-source plant reintroductions. Biological Conservation, 192, 1–9.
Zeng, Z.-B., Wang, T. & Zou, W. (2005). Modeling quantitative trait loci and interpretation of models. Genetics, 169, 1711–1725.
Zhang, L., Hood, G.R., Carroo, I., Ott, J.R. & Egan, S.P. (2021). Context-dependent reproductive isolation: host plant variability drives fitness of hybrid herbivores. The American Naturalist, 000–000.