Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Map of collecting locations in Victoria, Australia. This map
was generated using the R packages “ggmap” (Kahle & Wickham, 2013)
and “ggplot2” (Wickham, 2016).
Figure 2. Eadya Bayesian CO1 Phylogeny. For all relevant
nodes the posterior probabilities are listed. The scale bar refers to
the number of substitutions for tree branches.
Figure 3. Host Bayesian CO1 Phylogeny. For all relevant nodes the
posterior probabilities are listed. The scale bar refers to the number
of substitutions per site for tree branches.
Figure 4. Jane 4 Default Cost Co-phylogeny. Cospeciation events are
indicated by a white circle. Duplication events are indicated by a
solid-colored circle. Duplication and Host Switch events are indicated
by a solid-colored circle and an arrow. Loss events are indicated by a
dashed line. Failure to Diverge events are indicated by a squiggly line.
Figure 5A-D. Principal Component Analysis Plots. A) Plot of first and
second component comparing Eucalyptus species using both damaged
and undamaged leaves. B) Plot of first and second component comparingEucalyptus globulus damaged and undamaged leaves. C) Plot of
first and second component comparing beetle species using damagedEucalyptus leaves. D) Plot of the first and second component
comparing Eadya species using damaged Eucalyptus leaves.
Table 1. Eadya Intra and Interspecific Distance Matrix forCO1 . Intraspecific distance is highlighted in grey.
Table 2. Host Intra and Interspecific Distance Matrix for CO1 .
Intraspecific distance is highlighted in grey.
Table 3. Results of the ANOVAs for the Principal Component Analyses
visualized in Figure 5A-D.
Table 4. Results of the Tukeys Post Hoc Analyses for the Parasitoid and
Beetle ANOVAs