Discussion
The presented case highlights the difficulties in diagnosis and
treatment of DMPM. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is an extremely
rare malignancy of the peritoneum in children and has a poor prognosis.
As in our case, the presence of non-specific clinical symptoms such as
abdominal discomfort, ascites, and weight loss can contribute to the
delay in diagnosis [4].
Pediatric mesothelioma is not associated with asbestos exposure as much
as the adult disease is. In this case, asbestos exposure was not
documented in the patient or his direct relatives. Additionally, she
also had no family history of cancer.
Without aggressive treatments, DMPM is rapidly fatal. In the past, DPMM
was treated in most cancer centers with a combination of systemic
chemotherapy and palliative surgery. However, the median survival before
year 2000 was 1 year and patients did not appear to be responding to
these treatments [3]. DMPM mostly remains localized in the
abdominopelvic space throughout its course. The combination of CRS and
HIPEC, applied for regional treatment, resulted significant improvement
in treatment results [7-10]. This approach involves optimal
operative tumor cytoreduction to improve efficacy of perioperative HIPEC
as the penetration of HIPEC into peritoneal nodules is generally limited
to ≤ 3 mm [8].
The extremely low incidence of DMPM makes it nearly impossible to
conduct randomized trials for the most effective chemotherapy regimen.
Until recent years platinum agents plus folate antimetabolites, such as
pemetrexed, have been the only approved first-line treatment regimens
for DMPM. Pemetrexed/cisplatin combination has not been changed as a
standart treatment since 2004. However, long-term survival outcomes with
chemotherapy remained poor. In adults, Checkmate 743 randomized, phase 3
trial showed clinically significant improvement in overall survival with
immunotherapy added to pemetrexed and platinum in the first-line
treatment of unresectable DMPM. Then, In October 2020, the US Food and
Drug Administration approved nivolumab plus ipilimumab for this patient
population [2, 11]. In the present case, neoadjuvant systemic
chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed, CRS, and HIPEC therapy
showed beneficial responses of reducing the right lower abdominal mass,
improving the peritoneal thickening, and clearing the ascites. Then, we
performed nivolumab maintenance therapy, which also showed a favorable
response for about 14 months. We think that this report demonstrates the
need of immunotherapy in pediatric cases as well as adult cases, because
it can reverse the course of a potentially fatal disease.
ICI initiate antitumor immunity. However, these agents can cause
immune-related side effects that can affect various organs [12, 13].
Renal immune related side effects most commonly present with
asymptomatic acute kidney injury, which is often detected by routine
laboratory testing. The severity of acute kidney injury ranges from mild
to severe. As this group of patients have several reasons to have acute
kidney injury, it can be challenging to diagnose [13]. In our case,
the baseline creatinine level was normal at the time of diagnosis and
before nivolumab treatment was started. At the 4th month of nivolumab
treatment, serum creatinine elevation (Grade2, CTCAE v5) and
hypertension (Grade3, CTCAE v5) were observed. No other factor was found
to explain the nephrotoxicity. After reducing the dose of nivolumab by
25 percent, renal functions and blood pressure monitoring remained
normal. Patients using ICI should be closely monitored for immune
related side effects throughout their follow-up. Especially in terms of
renal immune related side effects, renal functions and blood pressure
monitoring should be followed closely even if there are no symptoms.
We herein report a child with DMPM, a rare and aggressive tumor. She
responded well to chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed, CRS,
HIPEC and maintenance nivolumab. The meaningful and durable clinical
response to nivolumab in the current case of DMPM suggests the utility
of immunotherapy in children with DMPM. To our best knowledge, we are
the first to describe a successful treatment with nivolumab in a
pediatric patient with DMPM. However, a well-designed multicenter
clinical trial is needed to examine whether nivolumab should be
considered as a new treatment option for pediatric DMPM. Additionally,
collaborative research between pediatric oncologists and adult experts
should be reinforced and supported to develop pediatric targeted
therapies, especially for adult type cancers occurring in children.