Discussion
The presented case highlights the difficulties in diagnosis and treatment of DMPM. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is an extremely rare malignancy of the peritoneum in children and has a poor prognosis. As in our case, the presence of non-specific clinical symptoms such as abdominal discomfort, ascites, and weight loss can contribute to the delay in diagnosis [4].
Pediatric mesothelioma is not associated with asbestos exposure as much as the adult disease is. In this case, asbestos exposure was not documented in the patient or his direct relatives. Additionally, she also had no family history of cancer.
Without aggressive treatments, DMPM is rapidly fatal. In the past, DPMM was treated in most cancer centers with a combination of systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery. However, the median survival before year 2000 was 1 year and patients did not appear to be responding to these treatments [3]. DMPM mostly remains localized in the abdominopelvic space throughout its course. The combination of CRS and HIPEC, applied for regional treatment, resulted significant improvement in treatment results [7-10]. This approach involves optimal operative tumor cytoreduction to improve efficacy of perioperative HIPEC as the penetration of HIPEC into peritoneal nodules is generally limited to ≤ 3 mm [8].
The extremely low incidence of DMPM makes it nearly impossible to conduct randomized trials for the most effective chemotherapy regimen. Until recent years platinum agents plus folate antimetabolites, such as pemetrexed, have been the only approved first-line treatment regimens for DMPM. Pemetrexed/cisplatin combination has not been changed as a standart treatment since 2004. However, long-term survival outcomes with chemotherapy remained poor. In adults, Checkmate 743 randomized, phase 3 trial showed clinically significant improvement in overall survival with immunotherapy added to pemetrexed and platinum in the first-line treatment of unresectable DMPM. Then, In October 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved nivolumab plus ipilimumab for this patient population [2, 11]. In the present case, neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed, CRS, and HIPEC therapy showed beneficial responses of reducing the right lower abdominal mass, improving the peritoneal thickening, and clearing the ascites. Then, we performed nivolumab maintenance therapy, which also showed a favorable response for about 14 months. We think that this report demonstrates the need of immunotherapy in pediatric cases as well as adult cases, because it can reverse the course of a potentially fatal disease.
ICI initiate antitumor immunity. However, these agents can cause immune-related side effects that can affect various organs [12, 13]. Renal immune related side effects most commonly present with asymptomatic acute kidney injury, which is often detected by routine laboratory testing. The severity of acute kidney injury ranges from mild to severe. As this group of patients have several reasons to have acute kidney injury, it can be challenging to diagnose [13]. In our case, the baseline creatinine level was normal at the time of diagnosis and before nivolumab treatment was started. At the 4th month of nivolumab treatment, serum creatinine elevation (Grade2, CTCAE v5) and hypertension (Grade3, CTCAE v5) were observed. No other factor was found to explain the nephrotoxicity. After reducing the dose of nivolumab by 25 percent, renal functions and blood pressure monitoring remained normal. Patients using ICI should be closely monitored for immune related side effects throughout their follow-up. Especially in terms of renal immune related side effects, renal functions and blood pressure monitoring should be followed closely even if there are no symptoms.
We herein report a child with DMPM, a rare and aggressive tumor. She responded well to chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed, CRS, HIPEC and maintenance nivolumab. The meaningful and durable clinical response to nivolumab in the current case of DMPM suggests the utility of immunotherapy in children with DMPM. To our best knowledge, we are the first to describe a successful treatment with nivolumab in a pediatric patient with DMPM. However, a well-designed multicenter clinical trial is needed to examine whether nivolumab should be considered as a new treatment option for pediatric DMPM. Additionally, collaborative research between pediatric oncologists and adult experts should be reinforced and supported to develop pediatric targeted therapies, especially for adult type cancers occurring in children.