References
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A.
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and
mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin.
2018 Nov;68(6):394-424.
2. Olawaiye AB, Baker TP, Washington MK, Mutch DG. The new (Version 9)
American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging for
cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):287-98.
3. Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet.
2019 Jan 12;393(10167):169-82.
4. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A.
Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108.
5. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjose S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et
al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a
worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203.
6. Noguchi T, Zaitsu M, Oki I, Haruyama Y, Nishida K, Uchiyama K, et al.
Recent Increasing Incidence of Early-Stage Cervical Cancers of the
Squamous Cell Carcinoma Subtype among Young Women. International journal
of environmental research and public health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20).
7. Liontos M, Kyriazoglou A, Dimitriadis I, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A.
Systemic therapy in cervical cancer: 30 years in review. Crit Rev Oncol
Hematol. 2019 May;137:9-17.
8. Basaran D, Leitao MM, Jr. The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive
Surgery for Cervical Cancer. Annals of surgical oncology. 2021
Jan;28(1):204-11.
9. Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum NR, Apte SM, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al.
Cervical Cancer, Version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015
Apr;13(4):395-404; quiz
10. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et
al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for
Cervical Cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2018 Nov
15;379(20):1895-904.
11. Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J, et
al. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for
Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2018
Nov 15;379(20):1905-14.
12. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva,
cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):103-4.
13. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Burrell MO, Benigno B, Welander CE. Laparoscopic
radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):699.
14. Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, Kim MK, Yoo HJ, Kim YM, et al. Comparative
study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal
radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecologic
oncology. 2004 Jan;92(1):277-83.
15. Rodriguez J, Rauh-Hain JA, Saenz J, Isla DO, Rendon Pereira GJ,
Odetto D, et al. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical
hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with
early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis. International
journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International
Gynecological Cancer Society. 2021 Apr;31(4):504-11.
16. Lee EJ, Kang H, Kim DH. A comparative study of laparoscopic radical
hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage
cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol. 2011 May;156(1):83-6.
17. Cao T, Feng Y, Huang Q, Wan T, Liu J. Prognostic and Safety Roles in
Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A
Meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Dec;25(12):990-8.
18. Wang YZ, Deng L, Xu HC, Zhang Y, Liang ZQ. Laparoscopy versus
laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC
cancer. 2015 Nov 24;15:928.
19. Frumovitz M, Obermair A, Coleman RL, Pareja R, Lopez A, Ribero R, et
al. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus
minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a
multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):851-60.
20. Cusimano MC, Baxter NN, Gien LT, Moineddin R, Liu N, Dossa F, et al.
Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing
radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019
Dec;221(6):619 e1- e24.
21. Liang C, Liu P, Cui Z, Liang Z, Bin X, Lang J, et al. Effect of
laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical
complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China,
2004-2015. Gynecologic oncology. 2020 Jan;156(1):115-23.
22. Committee FGO. FIGO statement on minimally invasive surgery in
cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;149(3):264.
23. Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al.
Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in
Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):64-84.
24. Querleu D, Cibula D, Concin N, Fagotti A, Ferrero A, Fotopoulou C,
et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a European Society of
Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) statement. International journal of
gynecological cancer : official journal of the International
Gynecological Cancer Society. 2020 Jan;30(1):15.
25. Brandt B, Sioulas V, Basaran D, Kuhn T, LaVigne K, Gardner GJ, et
al. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical
hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival
outcomes. Gynecologic oncology. 2020 Mar;156(3):591-7.
26. Jensen PT, Schnack TH, Froding LP, Bjorn SF, Lajer H, Markauskas A,
et al. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally
invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based
study. European journal of cancer. 2020 Mar;128:47-56.
27. Jin YM, Liu SS, Chen J, Chen YN, Ren CC. Robotic radical
hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open
radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. PloS one.
2018;13(3):e0193033.
28. Falconer H, Palsdottir K, Stalberg K, Dahm-Kahler P, Ottander U,
Lundin ES, et al. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an
international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the
International Gynecological Cancer Society. 2019 Jul;29(6):1072-6.
Figure legends
Figure 1. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)
diagram. Patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent radical
surgery from January 2013 to December 2017.
Figure 2. (A) Disease free survival (DFS). (B) Overall survival (OS).