Conclusion
In this retrospective study, we demonstrated that there was no
statistical significance of the mean age, BMI, FIGO stage, histology and
postoperative adjuvant therapy among ARH, LRH, RRH and VRH groups.
Five-year DFS in LRH group was shorter than that in ARH and RRH groups.
The total 5-year OS curve of the four groups was statistically
significant. Additionally, 5-year OS in ARH and RRH groups was better
than that in LRH group. The survival outcomes between ARH and RRH were
similar for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.