References
1. Antoine C, Young BK, Young B. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. J Perinat Med [Internet]. 2020 Sep 4 [cited 2021 Apr 2];49(1):5–16. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887190
2. Osterman MJK. Recent trends in vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: United States, 2016-2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Mar;(359):1-8.
3. Knight HE, Gurol-Urganci I, Van Der Meulen JH, Mahmood TA, Richmond DH, Dougall A, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: A cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG. 2014;121(2):183–92.
4. Cook JR, Jarvis S, Knight M, Dhanjal MK. Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: Incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study. BJOG. 2013; 120:772. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12158.
5. Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:262.e1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035.
6. Joseph KS, Shiliang L, Muraca GM, Sabr Y, Pressey T, Liston RM. Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity. Cmaj. 2018;190(18):E556–64.
7. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–12.
8. Shipp TD, Zelop C, Cohen A, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Post-Cesarean delivery fever and uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:136-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02319-0
9. Gur R, Duggal SD, Rongpharpi SR, Srivastava R, Kumar A, Gupta V, et al. Post caesarean surgical site infections. Arch Clin Microbiol. 2015;6:4
10. Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2008; 70 Suppl 2:3-10. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(08)60017-1.
11. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD, Dowd SE. Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation. J Wound Care. 2008 17(8):333-41. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2008.17.8.30796.
12. Davis SC, Ricotti C, Cazzaniga A, Welsh E, Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo. Wound Repair Regen. 2008; 16(1):23-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00303.x
13. Black CE, Costerton JW. Current concepts regarding the effect of wound microbial ecology and biofilms on wound healing. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:1147-60. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.08.009.
14. Infections P. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 195 Summary: Prevention of Infection After Gynecologic Procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(6):1177–9.
15. Antibiotics P. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199: Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):e103–19.
16. Gynecologists T american college of obstetricians and. Intrapartum Management of Intraamniotic Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):e95–101.
17. Salman L, Hiersch L, Shmueli A, et al. Complicated primary cesarean delivery increases the risk for uterine rupture at subsequent trial of labor after cesarean. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(2):273–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4801-x
18. Vilchez Gustavo, Nazeer S, Kumar K, Warren M, Dai J, Sokol RJ. Contemporary epidemiology and novel predictors of uterine rupture: a nationwide population-based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:869–75.