References
1. El-Hamamy E, Arulkumaran S. Poor progress of labour. Current
Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005 2005/02/01/;15(1):1-8.
2. Rosenbloom JI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, Woolfolk CL, López JD, Macones GA,
et al. New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery
patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 2017/12/01/;217(6):689.e1-.e8.
3. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the
primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014
2014/03/01/;210(3):179-93.
4. Charoenboon C, Srisupundit K, Tongsong T. Rise in cesarean section
rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern
Thailand. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;287(1):47-52.
5. Maharaj D. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics.
Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2010 Jun;65(6):387-95.
6. Morgan MA, Thurnau GR, Fishburne JI, Jr. The fetal-pelvic index as an
indicator of fetal-pelvic disproportion: a preliminary report. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Sep;155(3):608-13.
7. Lenhard M, Johnson T, Weckbach S, Nikolaou K, Friese K, Hasbargen U.
Three-dimensional pelvimetry by computed tomography. La radiologia
medica. 2009 2009/06/23;114(5):827.
8. Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Parer JT, Hricak H, Callen PW.
Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR American journal of
roentgenology. 1985 May;144(5):947-50.
9. Prayer D, Malinger G, Brugger PC, Cassady C, De Catte L, De
Keersmaecker B, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of fetal
magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017
May;49(5):671-80.
10. Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Takwoingi Y, Thornton JG, Jones NW. Antenatal
magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal
macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016
Jan;123(1):77-88.
11. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing
the First Cesarean Delivery: Summary of a Joint: Eunice Kennedy Shriver:
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for
Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists Workshop. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012;120(5).
12. Napolitano R, Dhami J, Ohuma EO, Ioannou C, Conde-Agudelo A, Kennedy
SH, et al. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic
review of charts. BJOG. 2014 Apr;121(5):556-65.
13. Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction,
gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstetrics
& Gynecology. 2003 2003/08/01/;102(2):287-93.
14. Rossi RM, Requarth E, Warshak CR, Dufendach KR, Hall ES, DeFranco
EA. Risk Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery Among Women Undergoing
Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):559-68.
15. Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Hatab MR, Twickler DM,
Leveno KJ. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of
labor dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):919-26.
16. Kim Y, Margonis GA, Prescott JD, Tran TB, Postlewait LM, Maithel SK,
et al. Nomograms to Predict Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival After
Curative Resection of Adrenocortical Carcinoma. JAMA surgery. 2016
Apr;151(4):365-73.
17. Harrell FE, Jr., Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models:
issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and
measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in medicine. 1996 Feb
28;15(4):361-87.
18. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM. Traditional statistical methods for
evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to clinical value:
towards a decision analytic framework. Seminars in oncology. 2010
Feb;37(1):31-8.
19. Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, Ertl-Wagner B, Deppe C, Mahner S,
et al. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in
patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation
at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):351-9.
20. Joyce DN, Giwa-Osagie F, Stevenson GW. Role of pelvimetry in active
management of labour. British medical journal. 1975 Nov
29;4(5995):505-7.
21. Spörri S, Hänggi W, Braghetti A, Vock P, Schneider H. Pelvimetry by
magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia.
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;89(6):902-8.
22. Lilford RJ, van Coeverden de Groot HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The
relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and
vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical
disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances.
British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1990 Oct;97(10):883-92.
23. Macones GA, Chang JJ, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Wang J, Cahill AG.
Prediction of cesarean delivery using the fetal-pelvic index. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):431.e1-8.
24. Ferguson JE, 2nd, Newberry YG, DeAngelis GA, Finnerty JJ, Agarwal S,
Turkheimer E. The fetal-pelvic index has minimal utility in predicting
fetal-pelvic disproportion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998
Nov;179(5):1186-92.
25. Burke N, Burke G, Breathnach F, McAuliffe F, Morrison J, Turner M,
et al. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman:
results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study. American
journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2017;216(6):598.e1-.e11.
26. Smith G, Dellens M, White I, Pell J. Combined logistic and Bayesian
modeling of cesarean section risk. American journal of obstetrics
gynecology. 2004;191(6):2029-34.
27. Al Housseini A, Newman T, Cox A, Devoe LD. Prediction of risk for
cesarean delivery in term nulliparas: a comparison of neural network and
multiple logistic regression models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009
2009/07/01/;201(1):113.e1-.e6.
28. Sims CJ, Meyn L, Caruana R, Rao RB, Mitchell T, Krohn M. Predicting
cesarean delivery with decision tree models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000
2000/11/01/;183(5):1198-206.
29. Costantine MM, Fox K, Byers BD, Mateus J, Ghulmiyyah LM, Blackwell
S, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal
birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1029-33.
30. van Loon AJ, Mantingh A, Serlier EK, Kroon G, Mooyaart EL, Huisjes
HJ. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in
breech presentation at term. Lancet. 1997 Dec 20-27;350(9094):1799-804.
31. Fox L, Huerta-Enochian G, Hamlin J, Katz V, gynecology. The magnetic
resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: a pilot study in the
community hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.
2004;190(6):1679-85; discussion 85-8.
32. Mengert WF. Estimation of pelvic capacity. Journal of the American
Medical Association. 1948 Sep 18;138(3):169-74.
33. Li YG, Chen CL, Liao KD, Yu YH, Xu YK, Wang Y, et al. Study on the
cephalopelvic relationship with cephalic presentation in nulliparous
full-term Chinese pregnant women by MRI with three-dimensional
reconstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):433-41.
34. Zaretsky M, Reichel T, McIntire D, Twickler D, gynecology.
Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to ultrasound in the estimation
of birth weight at term. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.
2003;189(4):1017-20.