References
[1] Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/ Edn. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands. ISBN 978-94-92671-07-3.
[2] Preminger G. M. et al. 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral Calculi. J. Urol. 2007; vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2418–2434. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039
[3] Acón L., Daniel J., Villa T., Baenas C., Jurado O., and Tormo B. Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Increasing the Energy Dose Applied per Session Through Increasing the Number of Shock Waves in Extracorporeal Lithotripsy : a Prospective and Comparative Study. 2017; pp. 1–22. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0261
[4] Mugiya S., Ito T., Maruyama S., Hadano S., and Nagae H. Endoscopic Features of Impacted Ureteral Stones. J. Urol. 2004; vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 89–91. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100960.08768.81
[5] Deliveliotis C., Chrisofos M., Albanis S., Serafetinides E., Varkarakis J., and Protogerou V. Management and Follow-up of Impacted Ureteral Stones. Urol. Int. 2003; vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 269–272. DOI: 10.1159/000070133
[6] Sarica K. et al. Ureteral Wall Thickness at the Impacted Ureteral Stone Site: a Critical Predictor for Success Rates After SWLUrolithiasis . 2014;vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 83–88. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0724-6
[7] Yamashita S., Kohjimoto Y., Iguchi T., Nishizawa S., Kikkawa K., and Hara I. Ureteral Wall Volume at Ureteral Stone Site is a Critical Predictor for Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes : Comparison with Ureteral Wall Thickness and Area. Urolithiasis . 2019; no. 0123456789. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01154-w
[8] Wiesenthal J. D., Ghiculete D., Honey J. D., and Pace K. T. Evaluating the Importance of Mean Stone Density and Skin-to-Stone Distance in Predicting Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal and Ureteric Calculi. 2010; pp. 307–313. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0
[9] Liong N. L., Clayman R. V., Gittes R. F, Lingeman J. E., Huffman J. L, and Lyon E. Treatment Options for Proximal Ureteral URolithiasis : Review and Recommendations. 1989; vol. 141, pp. 504–509. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40874-3
[10] Goren et al. Endourology and Stones Time to Stone Clearance for Ureteral Stones Treated with Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.URL . 2011; vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 26–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.060
[11] Besien J. V., Uvin P., Hermie I., Tailly T., and Merckx L. Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi : A Randomized Prospective Study. 2017; vol. 2017. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7802672
[12] Yoshida, T., Inoue, T., Omura, N., Okada, S., Hamamoto, S., Kinoshita, H., & Matsuda, T. Ureteral wall thickness as a preoperative indicator of impacted stones in patients with ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urology. 2017; 106, 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.047
[13] Eden C. G., Mark I. R., Gupta R. R., Eastman J., Shrotri N. C. & Tiptaft R. C. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates. Journal of endourology. 1998; 12(4), 307-312. DOI: 10.1089/end.1998.12.307
[14] Yamashita S., Iwahashi Y., Deguchi R., Kikkawa K., Kohjimoto Y., & Hara I. Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases. Urolithiasis. 2020; 1-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01178-7
[15] Guler, Y., Erbin, A., Kafkasli, A., & Ozmerdiven, G. Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients. Urolithiasis. 2020; 1-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01186-7
[16] Hubert KC S. M., Singh M, Zhou EH, Santos G. Charlson comorbidity index and success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Can J Urol. 2009; 16(4), 4733-4735.
[17] Simunovic D., Sudarevic B., Galic J. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Elderly : Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Stone-Free Rate and Complications. 2010; vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1831–1837. DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0329
[18] Onal B., Tansu N., Demirkesen O., Yalcin V., and Huang L. Nomogram and scoring system for predicting stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis. 2012pp. 3; 44–352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11281.x
[19] Ghoneim I. A., El-Ghoneimy M. N., El-Naggar A. E., Hammoud K. M., El-Gammal M. Y. & Morsi A. A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology. 2010; 75(1), 45-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071
[20] Ng C., Siu D. Y., Wong A., Goggins W., Chan E. S. and Wong K. Development of a Scoring System From Noncontrast Computerized Tomography Measurements to Improve the Selection of Upper Ureteral Stone for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. JURO . 2009; vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 1151–1157, DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.161
[21] Mains E. A., Blackmur J. P., Sharma A. D., Gietzmann W. K., El-Mokadem I., Stephenson C. & Cutress M. L. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance. Journal of Endourology. 2020; 34(4), 487-494. DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0717
[22] Sugino Y., Kato T., Furuya S., Sasaki T., Arima K., and Sugimura Y. The Usefulness of the Maximum Hounsfield Units (HU) in Predicting the Shockwave Lithotripsy Outcome for Ureteral Stones and the Proposal of Novel Indicators Using the Maximum HU. Urolithiasis . 2020; vol. 0, no. 0, p. 0. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01123-3
[23] Wolf J. S. Jr. Treatment Selection and Outcomes : Ureteral Calculi. 2007; vol. 34, pp. 421–430. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.010
Table 1 . Comparison of the outcomes in terms of demographic characteristics