References
[1] Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K et
al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology.
https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/ Edn. Presented at the EAU
Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The
Netherlands. ISBN 978-94-92671-07-3.
[2] Preminger G. M. et al. 2007 Guideline for the Management
of Ureteral Calculi. J. Urol. 2007; vol. 178, no. 6, pp.
2418–2434. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039
[3] Acón L., Daniel J., Villa T., Baenas C., Jurado O., and Tormo B.
Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Increasing the Energy Dose
Applied per Session Through Increasing the Number of Shock Waves in
Extracorporeal Lithotripsy : a Prospective and Comparative Study. 2017;
pp. 1–22. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0261
[4] Mugiya S., Ito T., Maruyama S., Hadano S., and Nagae H.
Endoscopic Features of Impacted Ureteral Stones. J. Urol. 2004;
vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 89–91. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100960.08768.81
[5] Deliveliotis C., Chrisofos M., Albanis S., Serafetinides E.,
Varkarakis J., and Protogerou V. Management and Follow-up of Impacted
Ureteral Stones. Urol. Int. 2003; vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 269–272.
DOI: 10.1159/000070133
[6] Sarica K. et al. Ureteral Wall Thickness at the Impacted
Ureteral Stone Site: a Critical Predictor for Success Rates After SWLUrolithiasis . 2014;vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 83–88. DOI:
10.1007/s00240-014-0724-6
[7] Yamashita S., Kohjimoto Y., Iguchi T., Nishizawa S., Kikkawa K.,
and Hara I. Ureteral Wall Volume at Ureteral Stone Site is a Critical
Predictor for Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes : Comparison with
Ureteral Wall Thickness and Area. Urolithiasis . 2019; no.
0123456789. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01154-w
[8] Wiesenthal J. D., Ghiculete D., Honey J. D., and Pace K. T.
Evaluating the Importance of Mean Stone Density and Skin-to-Stone
Distance in Predicting Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal and
Ureteric Calculi. 2010; pp. 307–313. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0
[9] Liong N. L., Clayman R. V., Gittes R. F, Lingeman J. E., Huffman
J. L, and Lyon E. Treatment Options for Proximal Ureteral
URolithiasis : Review and Recommendations. 1989; vol. 141, pp.
504–509. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40874-3
[10] Goren et al. Endourology and Stones Time to Stone Clearance for
Ureteral Stones Treated with Ekstracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.URL . 2011; vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 26–30. DOI:
10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.060
[11] Besien J. V., Uvin P., Hermie I., Tailly T., and Merckx L.
Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal
Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi : A
Randomized Prospective Study. 2017; vol. 2017. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7802672
[12] Yoshida, T., Inoue, T., Omura, N., Okada, S., Hamamoto, S.,
Kinoshita, H., & Matsuda, T. Ureteral wall thickness as a preoperative
indicator of impacted stones in patients with ureteral stones undergoing
ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urology. 2017; 106, 45-49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.047
[13] Eden C. G., Mark I. R., Gupta R. R., Eastman J., Shrotri N. C.
& Tiptaft R. C. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal
ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success
rates. Journal of endourology. 1998; 12(4), 307-312. DOI:
10.1089/end.1998.12.307
[14] Yamashita S., Iwahashi Y., Deguchi R., Kikkawa K., Kohjimoto
Y., & Hara I. Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast
computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in
ureteral stone cases. Urolithiasis. 2020; 1-6. DOI:
10.1007/s00240-020-01178-7
[15] Guler, Y., Erbin, A., Kafkasli, A., & Ozmerdiven, G. Factors
affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger
than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.
Urolithiasis. 2020; 1-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01186-7
[16] Hubert KC S. M., Singh M, Zhou EH, Santos G. Charlson
comorbidity index and success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Can J Urol. 2009; 16(4), 4733-4735.
[17] Simunovic D., Sudarevic B., Galic J. Extracorporeal Shockwave
Lithotripsy in Elderly : Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Stone-Free
Rate and Complications. 2010; vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1831–1837. DOI:
10.1089/end.2009.0329
[18] Onal B., Tansu N., Demirkesen O., Yalcin V., and Huang L.
Nomogram and scoring system for predicting stone-free status after
extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis.
2012pp. 3; 44–352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11281.x
[19] Ghoneim I. A., El-Ghoneimy M. N., El-Naggar A. E., Hammoud K.
M., El-Gammal M. Y. & Morsi A. A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison
between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology. 2010; 75(1), 45-50.
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071
[20] Ng C., Siu D. Y., Wong A., Goggins W., Chan E. S. and Wong K.
Development of a Scoring System From Noncontrast Computerized Tomography
Measurements to Improve the Selection of Upper Ureteral Stone for
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. JURO . 2009; vol. 181, no.
3, pp. 1151–1157, DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.161
[21] Mains E. A., Blackmur J. P., Sharma A. D., Gietzmann W. K.,
El-Mokadem I., Stephenson C. & Cutress M. L. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is
an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral
Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated
Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance. Journal
of Endourology. 2020; 34(4), 487-494. DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0717
[22] Sugino Y., Kato T., Furuya S., Sasaki T., Arima K., and
Sugimura Y. The Usefulness of the Maximum Hounsfield Units (HU) in
Predicting the Shockwave Lithotripsy Outcome for Ureteral Stones and the
Proposal of Novel Indicators Using the Maximum HU. Urolithiasis .
2020; vol. 0, no. 0, p. 0. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01123-3
[23] Wolf J. S. Jr. Treatment Selection and Outcomes : Ureteral
Calculi. 2007; vol. 34, pp. 421–430. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.010
Table 1 . Comparison of the outcomes in terms of demographic
characteristics