Figures captions
Figure 1. The location and
climatic context of Yanga National Park and Barmah National Park (image
courtesy of Google Earth on Aug/2018).
Figure 2. Scatterplots showing
LiDAR FTCC against predicted FTCC (a) Yanga and (b) Barmah using
individual site-specific models (RFYanga and RFBarmah). The results of
predicted FTCC using the model trained using both Yanga and Barmah data
(RFall) are shown in (c) for Yanga and (d) for Barmah. The blue line
indicates the regression line.
Figure 3. Spatial outputs for the
Yanga region of interest, mapping (a) predicted fractional tree canopy
cover (FTCC); (b); LiDAR FTCC and (c) the difference between the two
images. Similarly, spatial outputs for the Barmah region of interest,
mapping (d) predicted fractional tree canopy cover (FTCC); (e); LiDAR
FTCC and the (f) difference between the two images.
Figure 4. Bands of importance for
Sentienl-1 and Sentinel-2 for FTCC estimation for the RFYanga, RFBarmah
and RFAll Random forest models. The importance score was scaled between
0.1 and 1.