Corresponding author:
David J. Kaczorowski, MD
Surgical Director, Cardiac Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory
Support
Associate Professor of Surgery
University of Maryland
Division of Cardiac surgery
110 S. Paca St., 7th Floor
Office: 410-328-5842
Fax: 410-328-2750
Email: Dkaczorowski@som.umaryland.edu
Article word count: 1202
Abstract:
Left ventricular assist devices can extend life for select patients with
advanced heart failure. However, adverse events, including outflow
graft obstruction, may occur over time. Outflow graft obstruction is
generally insidious in onset and may result in low LVAD flows and
symptoms of heart failure. In this report, we describe a patient who
presented with acute decompensation requiring temporary mechanical
support due to development of extrinsic compression of the outflow graft
after HeartMate 3 implantation. The acuity and severity of this case
demonstrate the importance of avoiding this complication and promptly
diagnosing and treating it if it does occur.
Key words: LVAD, outflow graft obstruction, external compression, ECMO,
acute heart failure.
Introduction:
Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have been shown to increase the
duration and quality of life for patients with advanced heart failure.
As patients are supported for extended periods of time complications may
develop. One such example is compression of the outflow graft. As the
outflow graft exits the LVAD, it is housed inside an outer sheath, or
bend relief, that is intended to prevent kinks and obstruction of the
graft. Some surgeons cover the remainder of the outflow graft with extra
material, such as a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane, to protect
the graft during subsequent sternal re-entry. Reports have documented
that a proteinaceous material may form in between the graft and this
membrane, resulting in external compression of the outflow graft.
presenting symptoms are generally insidious 1,2,3.We
present a case of Heartmate 3 (HM3) LVAD failure due to extrinsic
outflow graft compression causing acute cardiogenic shock and requiring
temporary mechanical support.
Case report:
A 69-year-old man with a past history significant for coronary artery
disease and multiple myocardial infarctions, status post two coronary
artery bypass surgeries, underwent HM3 implantation at another center
for progressive heart failure as a bridge-to-transplant candidacy. His
post LVAD course was complicated by kinking of outflow graft,
necessitating revision via anterior thoracotomy two years after initial
LVAD implantation, with symptom resolution. He presented to our center 3
years after initial implantation with low LVAD flow to 2.4 L/min for 24
hours (normally 4.5-5 L/min), a pulsatility index of 1.3-1.9 (normally
3), and with new onset hemoptysis and chest pressure. Of note, at the
time of presentation, he had a recent history of 3 transient ischemic
attacks of unclear etiology while within therapeutic anticoagulation
goals. The patient was found to be in cardiogenic shock with pulmonary
edema and hypotension. Low flows and symptoms were not responsive to
medical management or changes in the LVAD speed. There was no evidence
of hemolysis or pump thrombosis. Given worsening hypoxemia and
hypotension despite inotropic support, he was emergently placed on
VA-ECMO for temporary support.
While on ECMO, the patient had severe coagulopathy complicated by
recurrent hemoptysis and bleeding from peripheral intravenous catheter
sites. He was intubated on hospital day 4 for worsening of hemoptysis.
Bronchoscopy was done and revealed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage,
requiring blood product administration for correction of his
coagulopathy. With resolution of hemoptysis, he was successfully
extubated on hospital day 10. Transesophageal echocardiography was
performed and showed no evidence of thrombus in the ventricle. Computed
tomographic angiography (CTA) of the chest revealed long segments of
narrowing of the LVAD outflow graft, more pronounced near the aortic
anastomosis (Fig 1A-D). However, it was unclear whether this was caused
by thrombus within the graft, or alternatively, external compression.
After optimizing his pulmonary and coagulation status, the patient
underwent redo-sternotomy on hospital day 14. Once the graft was
dissected out, it became clear that there was tense external compression
of the outflow graft caused by material between the outflow graft and
the PTFE covering. The covering was removed, and the exudate was
evacuated. Scar tissue around the aortic anastomosis was also lysed as
it appeared to be contributing to the compression. The procedure
resulted in immediate resolution of low flow and significant improvement
of the hemodynamics. Due to coagulopathy and the uncertainty regarding
the presence of thrombus within the outflow graft, his chest was left
open and a vacuum assisted closure dressing was placed. He was
transported to the intensive care unit in a stable condition, with no
inotropic or pressor support. On the following day, he underwent a
repeat CTA, which showed resolution of the compression with no
intraluminal thrombosis (Fig 1 E,F). With this finding and resolution of
his coagulopathy, he was returned to the operating room for chest
closure and decannulation from ECMO. The remainder of his hospital
course was uneventful. The patient was transferred out of the intensive
care unit on hospital day 20, and subsequently discharged to home on
hospital day 32. He continues to do well at most recent follow-up.
Comment:
The surgical technique of wrapping the outflow graft of LVADs has been
adopted to to minimize adhesions and prevent graft injury at the time of
subsequent operations. However, the outflow graft material may allow the
leakage of plasma contents3 and when covered with a
non-porous membrane can lead to the accumulation of bio-debris. This
accumulation can cause external compression, as seen in this case. While
the MOMENTUM 3 trial reported that the HM3 was associated with better
outcomes after 6 months when compared with the HeartMate 2, and none of
the patients randomized to the HM3 device had suspected or confirmed
thrombosis4, a few cases of external outflow
compression have been reported1,5. Table (1)
summarizes available case reports documenting external outflow graft
compression. Symptoms of low VAD flow and heart failure are mostly
gradually progressive. However, to our knowledge, this is the first
report on HM3 outflow graft external obstruction leading to acute
cardiogenic shock.
As definitive diagnosis of external compression may be challenging, we
recommend a high index of suspicion for outflow graft obstruction in
patients with repeated low-flow alarms. Diagnostic modalities may
include transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and CTA,
which is most useful. Differentiation between internal thrombus and
external compression is important in formulating an approach to
treatment. Although IVUS can be helpful to guide the diagnosis6, it carries the risk of embolization. In our case,
because of the long segment of compression, and the proximity of a
severely narrowed segment to the aortic anastomosis site (Fig. 2),
percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were not pursued.
External compression may be avoided by not wrapping the outflow graft
with additional material, or using a fenestrated wrap material, to allow
the fluid and debris to escape the space between the graft and the
external PTFE membrane. However, if it does occur, the choice of an
appropriate intervention is influenced by many factors, such as the
degree of compression, length and location of the compressed segment,
and the hemodynamic stability of the patient. Management options include
surgical removal of the anterior portion of the external wrap, outflow
graft replacement, or heart transplantation.123Stenting maybe an alternative to surgery in select
cases of external graft compression. However, it carries the risk of
embolization if internal thrombosis is present. This can be difficult to
exclude by CTA, and the use of IVUS may be warranted prior to
intervention, 6
Authors’ contributions: Concept/design: Kaczorowski, D. Data
analysis/interpretation: all authors. Drafting article: Abdullah, M.,
Shah, A. Critical revision of article: all authors. Approval of article:
all authors.