Comment on “The changing face of paracetamol toxicity and new
regimens for an old antidote acetylcysteine”
Dear Editor,
We have with interest read the recently published commentary by Isbister
and Chiew1 in which current approaches for the
treatment of paracetamol (PCM) poisoning with N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
were described. While we appreciate the authors’ valuable comments on
the challenges in managing this common poisoning, we noticed the
omission of the Danish NAC regimen.
NAC has been established as a highly efficient antidote in preventing
PCM-induced hepatotoxicity when administered within 8 h of PCM
ingestion.2 Treatment delays because of pending
laboratory results do not harmfully affect the outcome if NAC is
administered within 8 h. However,
it is frequent occurring that patients get treated beyond that time in
e.g. the UK,3 thus potentially decreasing the efficacy
of NAC.
In Denmark a 20-hour two-bag regime has been used for more than seven
years.4 All patients suspected of poisoning with more
than 6 g PCM are treated with NAC without risk stratification according
to a nomogram. Patients deliberately poisoning themselves with PCM may
not report reliable information of the time of ingestion and dose of
PCM. If a nomogram is used without an accurate time of ingestion, the
estimation of the risk of hepatotoxicity is unreliable.
It is well documented that
patients have been withheld treatment with NAC due to misinterpretation
of the nomogram resulting in hepatotoxicity.5Concomitant overdosing of several drugs that delay the time to peak PCM
concentration is common and may result in crossing from below to above
the treatment line5 leaving line crossers who required
treatment untreated. The same is relevant in cases of massive PCM
overdosing alone (drug bezoar) or poisonings with extended-release PCM
formulations (late PCM peak).6 Furthermore, it is
well-known that the half-life of PCM in liver injury exceeds the
expected 4 h used for treatment decision in the nomogram, thus further
questioning the reliability of the nomogram as a risk stratification
tool for patients suffering from liver diseases. Although the Danish
regime further reduces the risk of hepatoxicity, because of incorrectly
withheld or delayed NAC treatment compared to other regimes based on a
nomogram, it comes at a cost of more patients being treated.
We believe that all approaches deserve mention in order to identify the
most effective and safe approach to this poisoning. Therefore, we should
consider the effectiveness, duration and safety of choice of treatment
including the incidence of anaphylactoid reactions to NAC while assuring
that nobody is wrongly withhold NAC treatment. Not to mention, that the
abovementioned approach is associated with a comparable incidence of
anaphylactoid reactions when compared to other
approaches.4,7 It is worth mentioning that the primary
factor limiting a faster delivery of the antidote is the development of
anaphylactoid reactions. It is to be shown if pre-administrations of
antihistamines can reduce the dose-dependent side-effect leading to
development of faster NAC regimes7.
We declare no competing interests.
Alaa Daoud (orcid: 0000-0002-8714-4028)a,b, Kim Peder
Dalhoffa,b, Tonny Studsgaard Petersen (orcid:
0000-0002-9974-2738)a,b
aDepartment of
Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical science, Copenhagen
University, Copenhagen, Denmark
bDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and The Danish
Poison Information Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital,
Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
*Correspondence to Alaa Daoud, Alaa.Ahmed.Daoud@regionh.dk
1. Isbister GK, Chiew A. The changing face of paracetamol toxicity and
new regimens for an old antidote acetylcysteine. British Journal
of Clinical Pharmacology . n/a(n/a). doi:10.1111/bcp.14495
2. Prescott LF, Illingworth RN, Critchley JA, Stewart MJ, Adam RD,
Proudfoot AT. Intravenous N-acetylcystine: the treatment of choice for
paracetamol poisoning. Br Med J . 1979;2(6198):1097-1100.
doi:10.1136/bmj.2.6198.1097
3. The College of Emergency Medicine. Paracetamol Overdose Clinical
Audit 2013-14. Accessed September 7, 2020.
https://www.rcem.ac.uk/docs/Previous%20Audits/CEM8120-Paracetamol%20Overdose%20national%20report.pdf
4. Daoud A, Dalhoff KP, Christensen MB, Bøgevig S, Petersen TS. Two-bag
intravenous N-acetylcysteine, antihistamine pretreatment and high plasma
paracetamol levels are associated with a lower incidence of
anaphylactoid reactions to N-acetylcysteine. Clinical Toxicology .
2020;58(7):698-704. doi:10.1080/15563650.2019.1675886
5. Mutsaers A, Green JP, Sivilotti MLA, et al. Changing nomogram risk
zone classification with serial testing after acute acetaminophen
overdose: a retrospective database analysis. Clinical Toxicology .
2019;57(6):380-386. doi:10.1080/15563650.2018.1529320
6. Bizovi KE, Aks SE, Paloucek F, Gross R, Keys N, Rivas J. Late
Increase in Acetaminophen Concentration After Overdose of Tylenol
Extended Relief. Annals of Emergency Medicine .
1996;28(5):549-551. doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70119-1
7. Mullins ME, Yu M, O’Grady L, Khan S, Schwarz ES. Adverse reactions in
patients treated with the one-bag method of N-acetylcysteine for
acetaminophen ingestion. Toxicology Communications .
2020;4(1):49-54. doi:10.1080/24734306.2020.1770498