References
1. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al.
Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812-1822.
2. Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Kusa S, et
al. Five-year follow-up outcome after catheter ablation of persistent
atrial fibrillation using a sequential biatrial linear defragmentation
approach: What does atrial fibrillation termination during the procedure
imply? Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(1):34-40.
3. Kirzner JM, Raelson CA, Liu CF, et
al. Effects of focal impulse and rotor modulation-guided ablation on
atrial arrhythmia termination and inducibility: Impact on outcomes after
treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc
Electrophysiol. 2019;30(12):2773-2781.
4. Kochhauser S, Jiang CY, Betts TR,
et al. Impact of acute atrial fibrillation termination and prolongation
of atrial fibrillation cycle length on the outcome of ablation of
persistent atrial fibrillation: A substudy of the STAR AF II trial.Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(4):476-483.
5. Chauhan VS, Verma A, Nayyar S, et
al. Focal source and trigger mapping in atrial fibrillation: Randomized
controlled trial evaluating a novel adjunctive ablation strategy.Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(5 Pt A):683-691.
6. Zahid S, Cochet H, Boyle PM, et al.
Patient-derived models link re-entrant driver localization in atrial
fibrillation to fibrosis spatial pattern. Cardiovasc Res.2016;110(3):443-454.
7. Boyle PM, Zghaib T, Zahid S, et al.
Computationally guided personalized targeted ablation of persistent
atrial fibrillation. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3(11):870-879.
8. Akita T, Kiuchi K, Fukuzawa K, et
al. Lesion distribution after cryoballoon ablation and hotballoon
ablation: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging
analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(10):1830-1840.
9. Kurose J, Kiuchi K, Fukuzawa K, et
al. Lesion characteristics between cryoballoon ablation and
radiofrequency ablation with a contact-force sensing catheter:
late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging assessment.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020.
10. Ranjan R, Kato R, Zviman MM, et
al. Gaps in the ablation line as a potential cause of recovery from
electrical isolation and their visualization using MRI. Circ
Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(3):279-286.
11. Kircher S, Arya A, Altmann D, et
al. Individually tailored vs. standardized substrate modification during
radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized
study. Europace. 2018;20(11):1766-1775.
12. Ohe M, Haraguchi G, Kumanomido J,
et al. New tailored approach using a revised assessment of fragmented
potentials for persistent atrial fibrillation: Early area
defragmentation by modified CFAE module. J Cardiovasc
Electrophysiol. 2019;30(6):844-853.
13. Sakata K, Okuyama Y, Ozawa T, et
al. Not all rotors, effective ablation targets for nonparoxysmal atrial
fibrillation, are included in areas suggested by conventional indirect
indicators of atrial fibrillation drivers: ExTRa Mapping project.J Arrhythm. 2018;34(2):176-184.
14. McGann C, Akoum N, Patel A, et
al. Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome is predicted by left atrial
remodeling on MRI. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):23-30.
15. Higuchi K, Cates J, Gardner G, et
al. The Spatial Distribution of Late Gadolinium Enhancement of
Left Atrial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Atrial
Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(1):49-58.
16. Rolf S, Kircher S, Arya A, et al.
Tailored atrial substrate modification based on low-voltage areas in
catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm
Electrophysiol. 2014;7(5):825-833.
17. Chen J, Arentz T, Cochet H, et
al. Extent and spatial distribution of left atrial arrhythmogenic sites,
late gadolinium enhancement at magnetic resonance imaging, and
low-voltage areas in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation:
comparison of imaging vs. electrical parameters of fibrosis and
arrhythmogenesis. Europace. 2019;21(10):1484-1493.
18. Verma A, Sanders P, Champagne J,
et al. Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for
atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF): a multicenter, randomized trial.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):55-62.
19. Lim HS, Hocini M, Dubois R, et
al. Complexity and Distribution of Drivers in Relation to Duration of
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American College of
Cardiology. 2017;69(10):1257-1269.
20. Cochet H, Dubois R, Yamashita S,
et al. Relationship Between Fibrosis Detected on Late
Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Re-Entrant Activity
Assessed With Electrocardiographic Imaging in Human Persistent Atrial
Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(1):17-29.
21. Nakamura T, Kiuchi K, Fukuzawa K,
et al. Successful modulation of atrial fibrillation drivers anchoring to
fibrotic tissue after box isolation using an online real-time phase
mapping system: ExTRa Mapping. J Arrhythm. 2019;35(5):733-736.
22. Fukumoto K, Habibi M, Ipek EG, et
al. Association of Left Atrial Local Conduction Velocity With Late
Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With
Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol.2016;9(3):e002897.
23. Ali RL, Hakim JB, Boyle PM, et
al. Arrhythmogenic propensity of the fibrotic substrate after atrial
fibrillation ablation: a longitudinal study using magnetic resonance
imaging-based atrial models. Cardiovasc Res.2019;115(12):1757-1765.