Supporting information
Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article:
Figure S1. Images on HSG
The arrows refer to dilated, convoluted tubular structures with lack of diffusion of contrast medium into the abdomen.
Figure S2. Methods of the surgery
S2-A. Method of salpingectomy, we cut the mesosalpinx just below the fallopian tube using an ultrasonic device in order to prevent injury of the blood supply to the ipsilateral ovary, and resected the fallopian tube close to the interstitial part;
S2-B. Method of neosalpingostomy, we made a cross cut at the thinnest part of the blind ending fallopian tube, gently extended up to 1.5cm in order to form 4 fimbrial flaps, and sutured the mucosa to the serosal layer.
Table S1. Hull and Rutherford classification for tubal pelvic damage
Table S2. Surgical outcomes
Table S3. Supplemental details of comparision of reproductive outcomes between salpingectomy group and neosalpingostomy group
Table S4. Cox proportional hazards analysis