The article should take some time to explain this trend in using jupyter notebooks and describe the position of this work in the greater context. 
As it is currently written the article sounds a little too much like a marketing campaign.  We feel it would better match the tone of the magazine to focus more on the contribution and let the work "sell" itself. 
The article would also be improved by explaining in more detail where these materials have been used and what (if any) response to their usefulness (maybe include this in the abstract).   Are there any plans to continue to curate these materials or are the "done".