Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Xiaohua Liu for help with data validation and
statistical assistance. We are very grateful to our volunteer patients
for taking part in our research. Without the efforts, this research
would not have been possible.
References
- Adamson GD, Norman RJ. Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single
embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about
it? Fertil Steril 2020;114(4):680-9.
- Bai F, Wang DY, Fan YJ, Qiu J, Wang L, Dai Y, et al. Assisted
reproductive technology service availability, efficacy and safety in
mainland China: 2016. Hum Reprod 2020;35: 446-52.
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo
transfer. Fertil Steril 2012;97(4):835-42.
- ESHRE. Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo
transfer. ESHRE Campus Course Report. Hum Reprod 2001;16:790-800.
- Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell
A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo
transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2392-402.
- Gerris J, DeNeubourg D, Margelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M,
Barudy-Vasquez J, et al. Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves
the twinning rate without a decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of
an IVF/ICSI programme. Hum Reprod 2002;17(10):2626-31.
- Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomás C, Tapanainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara
L, et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a
randomized study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1900-3.
- Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive
Technology. Guidance on the limits of the number of embryos to
transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2017;107:901-3.
- Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M.
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study.
BMJ 2000; 24;320(7251):1708-12.
- Engmann L, Maconochie N, Tan SL, Bekir J. Trends in the incidence of
births and multiple births and the factors that determine the
probability of multiple birth after IVF treatment. Hum Reprod
2001;16,2598-605.
- Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidayer J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock
CH, et al. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol
2005;105:983-90.
- Waldenström U, Cnattingius S, Vixner L, Norman M. Advanced maternal
age increases the risk of very preterm birth, irrespective of parity:
a population-based register study. BJOG. 2017;124(8):1235-44.
- Niinima¨ki, M, Suikkari, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer in
women aged 40-44 years. Human Reproduction 2013;28(2);331-5.
- Veleva Z , Vilska S , Christel Hydén-Granskog, et al. Elective single
embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years. Human Reproduction, 2006,
21(8):2098-102.
- Vega M, Breborowicz A, Moshier EL, McGovern PG, Keltz MD. Blastulation
rates decline in a linear fashion from euploid to aneuploid embryos
with single versus multiple chromosomal errors. Fertil Steril.
2014;102(2):394-8.
- Cameron NJ, Bhattacharya S, McLernon DJ. Cumulative live birth rates
following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the
first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort
study. Hum Reprod. 2020;1;35(10):2365-74.
- Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van
Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with singe
blastocyststage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med
2006;354: 1139-46.
- Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Blastocyst
culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee
opinion. Fertil Steril 2013;1;99(3):667-72.
- Shi W, Zhang S, Zhao W, Xia X, Wang M, Wang H, et al. Factors related
to clinical pregnancy after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: a
retrospective and multivariate logistic regression analysis of 2313
transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2013;28(7):1768-75.
- Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst
score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single
blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1155-8.
- Liu X, Shi W, Shi J. Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer in
young women with regular menstrual cycles increases the live-birth
rates compared with hormone replacement treatment: a retrospective
cohort study. Fertil Steril 2020;113(4):811-7.
- Lawlor DA, Nelson SM. Effect of age on decisions about the numbers of
embryos to transfer in assisted conception: A prospective study.
Lancet 2012;11;379(9815):521-7.
- Heitmann RJ, Hill MJ, Richter KS, DeCherney AH, Widra EA. The
simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to
implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers. J Assist
Reprod Genet 2013; 30:563-7.
- Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D, Van Royen E, Vander Elst J,
Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, Kok P, Elseviers M, Annemans L, Pauwels
P, Dhont M. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective
single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI
cycles. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(4):917-23.
- Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomás C, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Elective
single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and
diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2009;24(7):1632-9.
- Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Desai J, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C.
The risk of embryo-endometrium asynchrony increases with maternal age
after ovarian stimulation and IVF. Reprod Biomed Online.
2016;33(1):50-5.
- Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. Influence of patient
age on the growth and transfer of blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil
Steril. 2002;77(4):700-5.
- Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the
uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17(1):107-20.
- VanMontfoort AP, Fiddelers AA, Janssen JM, Derhaag JG, Dirksen CD,
Dunselman GAJ, et al. In unselected patients, elective single embryo
transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower
pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized
controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2006;21:338-43.
- Davis LB, Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA. Elective single blastocyst
transfer in women older than 35. Fertil Steril 2008;89(1):230-1.
- Tannus S, Cohen Y, Son WY, Shavit T, Dahan MH. Cumulative live birth
rate following elective single blastocyst transfer compared with
double blastocyst transfer in women aged 40 years and over. Biol
Reprod 2017;35:733-8.
- Kamath MS, Mascarenhas M, Kirubakaran R, Bhattacharya S. Number of
embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or
intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews 2020: CD003416.
- Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E; ESHRE Reproduction and
Society Task Force. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and
social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):848-60.
- Macklon NS, Brosens JJ. The human endometrium as a sensor of embryo
quality. Biol Reprod 2014;91:1-8.
- Källén B, Finnström O, Lindam A , Nilsson E, Nygren KG.,et al. Trends
in delivery and neonatal outcome after in vitro fertilization in
Sweden: data for 25 years. Hum Reprod 2010;25 (4):1026-34.
- Eapen A, Ryan GL, Ten Eyck P, Van Voorhis BJ. Current evidence
supporting a goal of singletons: a review of maternal and perinatal
outcomes associated with twin versus singleton pregnancies after
in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil
Steril 2020;114(4):690-714.
- ESHRE. The European IVF monitoring programme (EIM), for the European
Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted
reproductive technology in Europe, 2005. Results generated from
European Registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1267–87.
- Chinese Society of Reproductive Medicine Annual Report: data analysis
of ART in 2017. J Reprod Med 2020,29(02):143-8.
- Newton CR, McBride J, Feyles V, Tekpetey F, Power S. Factors affecting
patients’ attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer.
Fertil Steril 2007;87(2):269-78.
Figure legends
Figure 1. Flow chart of the patient selection.
Figure 2. Kaplan- Meier curve for time to live birth.
Figure S1.
Birth rate and multiple birth rate in relation to the proportion of eSBT
among fresh blastocyst transfers for women over 36 years from 2015 to
2018.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients at the start of the
IVF/ICSI.