Discussion
His 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) exhibited an irregular rhythm
characterized by the following features: 1) dual atrioventricular (AV)
node physiology, two families of PR intervals, 2) discernible p waves
with morphology consistent with sinus rhythm, 3) some of the p waves
followed by two QRS complexes, 4) multiple wide QRS complexes
manifesting variable right bundle branch block (RBBB) aberrancy (Figure
1).
During electrophysiology study (EPS), baseline AV nodal retrograde
conduction was present, concentric and decremental in nature. Dual AV
nodal physiology was demonstrated by a 69 ms atrio-his (AH) “jump”
during atrial stimulation with single extra beat. No arrhythmia could be
induced, so isoproterenol (10 mcg/min) was administrated. Spontaneously,
a premature p wave traverses down both fast (FP) and slow pathways (SP)
simultaneously causing 1 to 2 initiation of a narrow complex tachycardia
(Figure 2), which was confirmed as typical slow-fast atrioventricular
nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by RV overdriving pacing: (1) VAV
response, (2) post pacing interval - tachycardia cycle length = 276 ms.
Later, an irregular narrow complex tachycardia was observed, every p
wave provoked two ventricular excitations with preceding His
deflections. Moreover, the rhythm pattern was not fixed, from constant
1:2 AV conduction to intermittent SP block or both pathways block
(Figure 3). After radiofrequency ablation in the SP region, the
incessant tachycardia was abolished.
Dual atrioventricular nodal non-re-entrant tachycardia (DAVNNT) caused
by simultaneous dual antegrade nodal conduction (also termed
“double-fire”) is an uncommon form of dual AV nodal tachycardia. It is
even more unique to find a patient presents with both AVNRT and DAVNNT,
which was considered theoretically impossible. It was believed that
there are two prerequisites for the occurrence of DAVNNT: (1) the
difference in conduction times over the FP and SP should be long enough
to exceed the refractory period of the lower common pathway and/or
His-Purkinje fibers. (2) retrograde conduction should be absent or poor
in both pathways, allowing sustained anterograde conductions along both
pathways [1,2]. The hypothesis makes AVNRT unlikely as retrograde
conduction is necessary for re-entrant circuit. There have only been few
reports of a co-existence of AVNRT and dual antegrade conduction
[3,4]. In this case, retrograde FP conduction presents at baseline,
but AVNRT cannot be induced until sympathetic stimulation changed the
balance between retrograde fast and anterograde slow pathway conduction.
Also in our case, dual antegrade conduction exhibited a wide spectrum of
presentations. In figure 3A, FP conduction (A1H1) prolonged the SP
conduction (A1H2) by its retrograde concealed penetration of the SP,
making it long enough to exceed the refractory period of His-Purkinje
system. Possible Mobitz type 1 AV block (Wenckebach) conduction along FP
(A2H3), which may just reflect the decremental properties of the distal
common pathway. However, the following FP (A3H4) conduction time
recovered instead of block, which can better be explained by retrograde
concealed conduction from the opposite pathway. Because A2 didn’t
conduct down the SP, there was no retrograde concealed conduction to FP,
explaining why the short A3H4 interval. Similarly, in figure 3B, the SP
impulse (A1H2) had concealed retrograde conduction into the next FP
conduction (A2H3), and likewise A2H3 prolonged the next SP conduction
(A2H4). The influence of slowing conduction through both pathways
resulted in further delayed retrograde conduction into the opposing
pathway, causing the next p wave (A3) reached the refractory period of
both pathways. One may argue the A3 could be just an echo beat. However,
the fact that atrial activation of high right atrium (HRA) is earlier
than coronary sinus (CS) and AA intervals remains the same makes it less
likely. During isoproterenol washout, the balance between the two
pathways changed again. We observed a constant changing rhythm mixed
with DAVNNT and SP or FP only conduction. One of the prerequisite of
maintaining DAVNNT should be the functional balance of bidirectional
conduction between FP and SP, rather than retrograde conduction block.
Autonomic nervous system plays a major role in modifying the balance of
nodal conduction system, resulting in different conduction properties at
different times, which makes this case possible.
In our case there are variable aberrant QRS morphologies, which can be
understood based on the HH intervals preceding the narrow versus the
aberrant complexes. RBBB aberration is functional, as a result of a long
preceding HH interval following by a short cycle (”rate-dependent
aberrancy”) (Figure 3A).
It is tricky to differentiate DAVNNT from junctional extrasystoles. But
the possibility of a junctional extrasystole with retrograde block is
very unlikely given the association between atrial excitations and His
depolarizations. Besides, abolition of arrhythmia by SP ablation seems
to be another strong proof of the diagnosis. Both AVNRT and DAVNNT
respond to SP region ablation.