References
Uncategorized References
1. Fink T, Schlüter M, Heeger CH, et al. Stand-Alone Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Additional Substrate Modification as Index Ablation Procedures in Patients With Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The Randomized Alster-Lost-AF Trial (Ablation at St. Georg Hospital for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation). Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2017;10(7).
2. Vogler J, Willems S, Sultan A, et al. Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Defragmentation: The CHASE-AF Clinical Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015;66(24):2743-2752.
3. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372(19):1812-1822.
4. Kircher S, Arya A, Altmann D, et al. Individually tailored vs. standardized substrate modification during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized study. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2018;20(11):1766-1775.
5. Yang B, Jiang C, Lin Y, et al. STABLE-SR (Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the Left Atrium During Sinus Rhythm) for the Treatment of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2017;10(11).
6. Liu Y, Niu XH, Yin X, et al. Elevated Circulating Fibrocytes Is a Marker of Left Atrial Fibrosis and Recurrence of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(6).
7. Lo LW, Tai CT, Lin YJ, et al. Progressive remodeling of the atrial substrate–a novel finding from consecutive voltage mapping in patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2007;18(3):258-265.
8. Masuda M, Fujita M, Iida O, et al. Influence of underlying substrate on atrial tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary vein isolation. Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society.2016;13(4):870-878.
9. Masuda M, Fujita M, Iida O, et al. An E/e’ ratio on echocardiography predicts the existence of left atrial low-voltage areas and poor outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2018;20(5):e60-e68.
10. Yamaguchi T, Tsuchiya T, Fukui A, et al. Impact of the extent of low-voltage zone on outcomes after voltage-based catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Journal of cardiology.2018;72(5):427-433.
11. Yamaguchi T, Tsuchiya T, Nagamoto Y, et al. Long-term results of pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis in regards to substrates and pulmonary vein reconnections.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2014;16(4):511-520.
12. Rolf S, Kircher S, Arya A, et al. Tailored Atrial Substrate Modification Based On Low-Voltage Areas in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2014.
13. Yamaguchi T, Tsuchiya T, Nakahara S, et al. Efficacy of Left Atrial Voltage-Based Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.2016;27(9):1055-1063.
14. Kottkamp H, Berg J, Bender R, Rieger A, Schreiber D. Box Isolation of Fibrotic Areas (BIFA): A Patient-Tailored Substrate Modification Approach for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2016;27(1):22-30.
15. Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;119(13):1758-1767.
16. Mahnkopf C, Badger TJ, Burgon NS, et al. Evaluation of the left atrial substrate in patients with lone atrial fibrillation using delayed-enhanced MRI: implications for disease progression and response to catheter ablation. Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society. 2010;7(10):1475-1481.
17. Ashihara T, Haraguchi R, Nakazawa K, et al. The role of fibroblasts in complex fractionated electrograms during persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation: implications for electrogram-based catheter ablation.Circ Res. 2012;110(2):275-284.
18. McDowell KS, Vadakkumpadan F, Blake R, et al. Mechanistic inquiry into the role of tissue remodeling in fibrotic lesions in human atrial fibrillation. Biophys J. 2013;104(12):2764-2773.
19. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2012;14(4):528-606.
20. Saini A, Huizar JF, Tan A, Koneru JN, Ellenbogen KA, Kaszala K. Scar Homogenization in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Evolution and Practice.J Atr Fibrillation. 2017;10(3):1645.
21. Kosiuk J, Dinov B, Kornej J, et al. Prospective, multicenter validation of a clinical risk score for left atrial arrhythmogenic substrate based on voltage analysis: DR-FLASH score. Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society.2015;12(11):2207-2212.
22. D’Ambrosio G, Romano S, Alothman O, et al. Computed tomography-derived left atrial volume index, sex, and age to predict the presence and the extent of left atrial low-voltage zones in patients with atrial fibrillation: The ZAQ score. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2020;31(4):895-902.
23. Matsuda Y, Masuda M, Asai M, et al. A new clinical risk score for predicting the prevalence of low-voltage areas in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2020;31(12):3150-3158.
24. Odening KE, Deiß S, Dilling-Boer D, et al. Mechanisms of sex differences in atrial fibrillation: role of hormones and differences in electrophysiology, structure, function, and remodelling. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2019;21(3):366-376.
25. Pfannmüller B, Boldt A, Reutemann A, et al. Gender-specific remodeling in atrial fibrillation? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2013;61(1):66-73.
26. Sánchez M, Secades L, Bordallo C, et al. Role of polyamines and cAMP-dependent mechanisms on 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone-elicited functional effects in isolated right atria of rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2009;54(4):310-318.
27. Tanaka N, Inoue K, Kobori A, et al. Sex differences in atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes: insights from a large-scale multicentre registry. EP Europace. 2020;22(9):1345-1357.
28. Teh AW, Kistler PM, Lee G, et al. Electroanatomic remodeling of the left atrium in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients without structural heart disease. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2012;23(3):232-238.
29. Miyamoto K, Tsuchiya T, Narita S, et al. Bipolar electrogram amplitudes in the left atrium are related to local conduction velocity in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.2009;11(12):1597-1605.
30. Hunter RJ, Liu Y, Lu Y, Wang W, Schilling RJ. Left atrial wall stress distribution and its relationship to electrophysiologic remodeling in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2012;5(2):351-360.
31. Hori Y, Nakahara S, Tsukada N, et al. The influence of the external structures in atrial fibrillation patients: Relationship to focal low voltage areas in the left atrium. International journal of cardiology. 2015;181:225-231.
32. Hori Y, Nakahara S, Kamijima T, et al. Influence of left atrium anatomical contact area in persistent atrial fibrillation-relationship between low-voltage area and fractionated electrogram. Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.2014;78(8):1851-1857.
33. Yang G, Yang B, Wei Y, et al. Catheter Ablation of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using Electrophysiologically Guided Substrate Modification During Sinus Rhythm After Pulmonary Vein Isolation.Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2016;9(2):e003382.
34. Masuda M, Asai M, Iida O, et al. Comparison of electrogram waveforms between a multielectrode mapping catheter and a linear ablation catheter. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.2019;42(5):515-520.