Fig. 3. Number of taxa assigned by the OBITools workflow (blue) and number of OTUs generated by the SWARM workflow (orange) in the families of fish (a) ; distribution of the differences between the two workflows as a function of family richness (b) and as a function of family sequencing coverage (c); distribution of the differences between OTUs and the number of taxa (species and genus) in the checklist as a function of family richness (d). (a)The difference of taxa/OTUs between the two methods (noted Δ) and the number of species in the checklist of the Bird’s Head region are on the right of the figure in grey and black respectively. For the OBITools workflow, only the sequences assigned to species and genus using ecotag program (similarity > 98% and > 90% respectively) are used in this figure. For the SWARM workflow, only the OTUs curated by LULU and assigned to family (similarity > 85%) are used in this figure.