Note:N=number of respondents (116). Interpretative scale: 1.00 ≤ MS
< 1.49 means strongly disagree (SD), 1.50 ≤ MS <
2.49 disagree (D), 2.50 ≤ MS < 3.49 moderately disagree (MOD),
3.50 ≤ MS < 4.49 means agree (AGR) and 4.50 ≤ MS ≤ 5.0
strongly agree (SAG). STD=Standard Deviation.
Table 4 shows the prevalent dimensions of strategic capabilityi n construction firms. The results show a general agreement
among the firms’ leadership on the variables as measures of strategic
capability to automation and transformation in the industry. The first
three most prevalent variables are the ability and resources to
communicate, interact and collaborate digitally , willingness and
leadership capability to organise, coordinate, manage team digitally as
well as the ability and resources to make job requirements with digital
tools and enhance understanding. These first three variables are
inter-woven, a firm that possess the readiness and willingness to scan
the environment for the needed information will only do so if there is a
leadership capability that supports such initiatives. Such information
when gathered will then be implemented to reflect positively in the
business.