Note:N=number of respondents (116). Interpretative scale: 1.00 ≤ MS < 1.49 means strongly disagree (SD), 1.50 ≤ MS < 2.49 disagree (D), 2.50 ≤ MS < 3.49 moderately disagree (MOD), 3.50 ≤ MS < 4.49 means agree (AGR) and 4.50 ≤ MS ≤ 5.0 strongly agree (SAG). STD=Standard Deviation.

Table 4 shows the prevalent dimensions of strategic capabilityi n construction firms. The results show a general agreement among the firms’ leadership on the variables as measures of strategic capability to automation and transformation in the industry. The first three most prevalent variables are the ability and resources to communicate, interact and collaborate digitally , willingness and leadership capability to organise, coordinate, manage team digitally as well as the ability and resources to make job requirements with digital tools and enhance understanding. These first three variables are inter-woven, a firm that possess the readiness and willingness to scan the environment for the needed information will only do so if there is a leadership capability that supports such initiatives. Such information when gathered will then be implemented to reflect positively in the business.