Conclusion
Our aim with this study was to use data to develop useful resources for researchers who want or need to share new data, by showing them where researchers choose to share similar data. Similarly, we aimed to support journal editors who want to recommend repositories and data sharing services to authors based on evidence. We have provided detailed information about frequently used domains and repositories across research disciplines and subject areas. These can be used as directional advice and inspiration, both for research authors and journal editors. What we have provided here could be used in combination with other resources, like FAIRsharing.org and its project to identify criteria that matter for repository selection
\cite{matter} and like
CoreTrust Seal and ELIXIR Core Data Resources
\cite{elixir}. These resources together will help facilitate a deeper understanding of best practices around data sharing, reporting standards, and data repositories.
Data availability statement
Processed research data are in Table \ref{133180}. Beyond that, data from originally submitted DASs are not shared, for the same reasons described in our previous study \cite{Graf}.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest
All authors are employed by Wiley and benefit from the company's success.