Single or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: An
ongoing debate
Abstract
Objectives To examine the effects of single- and double-layer uterine
closure techniques on uterine scar healing following cesarean delivery.
Design Randomised controlled trial Setting University Hospital of
Başkent from July 2018 to September 2019 Population This study assessed
a total of 282 women between 18-45 years of age who had singleton
pregnancies and had not previously undergone uterine surgeries. Methods
Participants were randomized into two following treatment groups:
single-layer closure with locking and double-layer closure with locking
in the first layer, but not in the second layer (NCT03629028).
Participants were evaluated at 6-9 months after cesarean section by
saline infusion sonohysterography to assess cesarean delivery scar
defects. Experienced sonographers who were not informed about the
uterine closure technique conducted these procedures. Results Of the 225
final participants, 116 received the double-layer closure technique,
while 109 received the single-layer technique. In this regard, the niche
rates and median niche depths based on transvaginal ultrasounds and
sonohysterography investigations were 21%, 0.9±1.8mm, and 41%,
2.1±1.9mm (p<0.001, p<0.001), respectively. The
niche rates were 37% for the single-layer group and 45.7% for the
double-layer group (p=0.22). Median niche widths were higher in the
double-layer group (p=0.006). Conclusions The single- and double-layer
closure techniques did not produce different impacts on uterine scare
niche development. However, the median niche width was higher for the
double-layer closure group. Tweetable abstract There was no difference
between single- and double layer closure in the rate of scar niche
development following cesarean delivery. Keywords cesarean delivery,
isthmocele, niche, uterine closure