loading page

Intercomparison of atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide (TransCom-COS; Part one): Evaluating the impact of transport and emissions on tropospheric variability using ground-based and aircraft data
  • +14
  • Marine Remaud,
  • Jin Ma,
  • Maarten C. Krol,
  • Camille Abadie,
  • Mike Cartwright,
  • Prabir K. Patra,
  • Yosuke Niwa,
  • Christian Rödenbeck,
  • Sauveur Belviso,
  • Linda Kooijmans,
  • Sinikka Lennartz,
  • Fabienne Maignan,
  • Martyn P. Chipperfield,
  • Richard J Pope,
  • Jeremy J Harrison,
  • Chris Wilson,
  • Philippe Peylin
Marine Remaud
LSCE

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jin Ma
Utrecht
Author Profile
Maarten C. Krol
Utrecht University
Author Profile
Camille Abadie
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE)
Author Profile
Mike Cartwright
National Centre for Earth Observation, Space Park Leicester, University of Leicester
Author Profile
Prabir K. Patra
JAMSTEC
Author Profile
Yosuke Niwa
National Institute for Environmental Studies
Author Profile
Christian Rödenbeck
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Author Profile
Sauveur Belviso
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE)
Author Profile
Linda Kooijmans
Wageningen University
Author Profile
Sinikka Lennartz
University of Oldenburg
Author Profile
Fabienne Maignan
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE)
Author Profile
Martyn P. Chipperfield
University of Leeds
Author Profile
Richard J Pope
University of Leeds
Author Profile
Jeremy J Harrison
National Centre for Earth Observation
Author Profile
Chris Wilson
Leeds University
Author Profile
Philippe Peylin
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE)
Author Profile

Abstract

We present a comparison of atmospheric transport model simulations for carbonyl sulfide (COS), within the framework of the ongoing atmospheric tracer transport model intercomparison project “TransCom”. Seven atmospheric transport models participated in the inter-comparison experiment and provided simulations of COS mixing ratios in the troposphere over a 9-year period (2010–2018), using prescribed state-of-the-art surface fluxes for various components of the atmospheric COS budget: biospheric sink, oceanic source, sources from fire and industry. Since the biosphere is the largest sink of COS, we tested sink estimates produced by two different biosphere models. The main goals of TransCom-COS are (a) to investigate the impact of the transport uncertainty and emission distribution in simulating the spatio-temporal variability of COS mixing ratios in the troposphere, and (b) to assess the sensitivity of simulated tropospheric COS mixing ratios to the seasonal and diurnal variability of the COS biosphere fluxes. To this end, a control case with state-of-the-art seasonal fluxes of COS was constructed. Models were run with the same fluxes and without chemistry to isolate transport differences. Further, two COS flux scenarios were compared: one using a biosphere flux with a monthly time resolution and the other using a biosphere flux with a three-hourly time resolution. In addition, we investigated the sensitivity of the simulated concentrations to different biosphere fluxes and to indirect oceanic emissions through dimethylsulfide (DMS) and carbon disulfide (CS2). The modelled COS mixing ratios were assessed against in-situ observations from surface stations and aircraft.