loading page

Gravity-Wave-Driven Seasonal Variability of Temperature Differences between ECMWF IFS and Rayleigh Lidar Measurements in the Lee of the Southern Andes
  • +5
  • Sonja Gisinger,
  • Inna Polichtchouk,
  • Andreas Dörnbrack,
  • Robert Reichert,
  • Bernd Kaifler,
  • Natalie Kaifler,
  • Markus Rapp,
  • Irina Sandu
Sonja Gisinger
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Inna Polichtchouk
ECMWF, ECMWF
Author Profile
Andreas Dörnbrack
DLR, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, DLR, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre
Author Profile
Robert Reichert
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center
Author Profile
Bernd Kaifler
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center
Author Profile
Natalie Kaifler
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center
Author Profile
Markus Rapp
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)
Author Profile
Irina Sandu
ECMWF, ECMWF
Author Profile

Abstract

Long-term high-resolution temperature data of the Compact Rayleigh Autonomous Lidar (CORAL) is used to evaluate temperature and gravity wave (GW) activity in ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) over R\’io Grande (53.79$^{\circ}$S, 67.75$^{\circ}$W), which is a hot spot of stratospheric GWs in winter. Seasonal and altitudinal variations of the temperature differences between the IFS and lidar are studied for 2018 with a uniform IFS version. Moreover, interannual variations are considered taking into account updated IFS versions. We find monthly mean temperature differences $<2$~K at 20-40~km altitude. At 45-55~km, the differences are smaller than 4~K during summer. The largest differences are found during winter (4~K in May 2018 and -10~K in August 2018, July 2019 and 2020). The width of the difference distribution (15th/85th percentiles), the root mean square error, and maximum differences between instantaneous individual profiles are also larger during winter ($>\pm10$~K) and increase with altitude. We relate this seasonal variability to middle atmosphere GW activity. In the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere, the observed temperature differences result from both GW amplitude and phase differences. The IFS captures the seasonal cycle of GW potential energy ($E_p$) well, but underestimates $E_p$ in the middle atmosphere. Experimental IFS simulations without damping by the model sponge for May and August 2018 show an increase in the monthly mean $E_p$ above 45~km from only $\approx10$~\% of the $E_p$ derived from the lidar measurements to 26~\% and 42~\%, respectively. GWs not resolved in the IFS are likely explaining the remaining underestimation of the $E_p$.
16 Jul 2022Published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres volume 127 issue 13. 10.1029/2021JD036270