loading page

Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks 1: plate tectonic mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
  • +8
  • Jiawei Zuo,
  • Alexander Webb,
  • Emily Joyce Chin,
  • Jason Harvey,
  • Peter J Haproff,
  • Thomas Mueller,
  • Qin Wang,
  • Lukáš Ackerman,
  • Arthur H. Hickman,
  • Dominik Sorger,
  • Anthony Ramírez-Salazar
Jiawei Zuo
The university of Hong kong, The university of Hong kong, The university of Hong kong

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Alexander Webb
University of Hong Kong, University of Hong Kong, University of Hong Kong
Author Profile
Emily Joyce Chin
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Author Profile
Jason Harvey
Leeds University, Leeds University, Leeds University
Author Profile
Peter J Haproff
University of North Carolina Wilmington, University of North Carolina Wilmington, University of North Carolina Wilmington
Author Profile
Thomas Mueller
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Author Profile
Qin Wang
Nanjing University, Nanjing University, Nanjing University
Author Profile
Lukáš Ackerman
Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Arthur H. Hickman
Geological Survey of Western Australia, Geological Survey of Western Australia, Geological Survey of Western Australia
Author Profile
Dominik Sorger
Geoscience Center, Geoscience Center, Geoscience Center
Author Profile
Anthony Ramírez-Salazar
University of Leeds, University of Leeds, University of Leeds
Author Profile

Abstract

How and when plate tectonics initiated remain uncertain. In part, this is because many signals that have been interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant-lid tectonics. One such signal involves early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt of southwestern Greenland, some ultramafic rocks have been interpreted as tectonically-exhumed mantle during Eoarchean subduction. To explore whether all Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks originated as cumulate and/or komatiite – i.e., without requiring plate tectonics – we examined the petrology and geochemistry of such rocks in the Isua supracrustal belt and the Paleoarchean East Pilbara Terrane of northwestern Australia, with Pilbara ultramafic rocks interpreted as representative of rocks from non-plate tectonic settings. We found that Pilbara ultramafic samples have relict cumulate textures, relative enrichment of whole-rock Os, Ir, and Ru versus Pt and Pd, and spinel with variable TiO2, relatively consistent Cr#, and variable and low Mg#. Similar geochemical characteristics also occur in variably altered Isua ultramafic rocks. We show that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks should have interacted with low Pt and Pd melts generated by sequestration of Pd and Pt into sulphide and/or alloy during magma generation or crystallization. Such melts cannot have interacted with a mantle wedge. Furthermore, altered mantle rocks and altered cumulates could have similar rock textures and whole-rock geochemistry such that they may not distinguish mantle from cumulate. Our findings suggest that depleted mantle interpretations are not consistent with geochemistry and/or rock textures obtained from Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks. Instead, cumulate textures of Pilbara samples, whole-rock Pt and Pd concentrations, and spinel geochemistry of Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks support cumulate origins and metasomatism involving co-genetic melts that formed in hot stagnant-lid settings. Collectively, these findings permit ≤ 3.2 Ga initiation of plate tectonics on Earth.