loading page

Integrated, Coordinated, Open, and Networked (ICON) Science to Advance the Geosciences: Introduction and Synthesis of a Special Collection of Commentary Articles
  • +2
  • Amy E. Goldman,
  • Sujata R. Emani,
  • Lina C. Pérez-Angel,
  • Josué A. Rodríguez-Ramos,
  • James C. Stegen
Amy E. Goldman
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Sujata R. Emani
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Office of National Programs, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Office of National Programs, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Office of National Programs
Author Profile
Lina C. Pérez-Angel
University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Geological Sciences
Author Profile
Josué A. Rodríguez-Ramos
Colorado State University, Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Colorado State University, Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Colorado State University, Soil and Crop Sciences Department
Author Profile
James C. Stegen
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Author Profile

Abstract

The sciences struggle to integrate across disciplines, coordinate across data generation and modeling activities, produce connected open data, and build strong networks to engage stakeholders within and beyond the scientific community. The American Geophysical Union (AGU) is divided into 25 sections intended to encompass the breadth of the geosciences. Here, we introduce a special collection of commentary articles spanning 19 AGU sections on challenges and opportunities associated with the use of ICON science principles. These principles focus on research intentionally designed to be Integrated, Coordinated, Open, and Networked (ICON) with the goal of maximizing mutual benefit (among stakeholders) and cross-system transferability of science outcomes. This article 1) summarizes the ICON principles; 2) discusses the crowdsourced approach to creating the collection; 3) explores insights from across the articles; and 4) proposes steps forward. There were common themes among the commentary articles, including broad agreement that the benefits of using ICON principles outweigh the costs, but that using ICON principles has important risks that need to be understood and mitigated. It was also clear that the ICON principles are not monolithic or static, but should instead be considered a heuristic tool that can and should be modified to meet changing needs. As a whole, the collection is intended as a resource for scientists pursuing ICON science and represents an important inflection point in which the geosciences community has come together to offer insights into ICON principles as a unified approach for improving how science is done across the geosciences and beyond.
Apr 2022Published in Earth and Space Science volume 9 issue 4. 10.1029/2021EA002099