loading page

Analysis of Oil and Gas Ethane and Methane Emissions in the Southcentral and Eastern United States Using Four Seasons of Continuous Aircraft Ethane Measurements
  • +10
  • Zachary Barkley,
  • Kenneth Davis,
  • Sha Feng,
  • Yu Yan Cui,
  • ALAN FRIED,
  • PETTER WEIBRING,
  • DIRK RICHTER,
  • JAMES WALEGA,
  • Scot Miller,
  • Maximilian Eckl,
  • Anke Roiger,
  • Alina Fiehn,
  • Julian Kostinek
Zachary Barkley
The Pennsylvania State University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Kenneth Davis
Pennsylvania State University
Author Profile
Sha Feng
Pennsylvania State University,Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Author Profile
Yu Yan Cui
The Pennsylvania State University
Author Profile
ALAN FRIED
University of Colorado Boulder
Author Profile
PETTER WEIBRING
University of Colorado Boulder
Author Profile
DIRK RICHTER
University of Colorado Boulder
Author Profile
JAMES WALEGA
University of Colorado Boulder
Author Profile
Scot Miller
Johns Hopkins University
Author Profile
Maximilian Eckl
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Standort Oberpfaffenhofen
Author Profile
Anke Roiger
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Standort Oberpfaffenhofen
Author Profile
Alina Fiehn
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Standort Oberpfaffenhofen
Author Profile
Julian Kostinek
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Standort Oberpfaffenhofen
Author Profile

Abstract

In the last decade, much work has been done to better understand methane (CH4) emissions from the oil and gas (O&G) industry in the United States. Ethane (C2H6), a gas that is co-emitted with thermogenic sources of CH4 , is emitted in the US almost entirely by the O&G sector. In this study, we perform an inverse analysis on 300 hours of atmospheric boundary layer C2H6 measurements to estimate C2H6 emissions from the US O&G sector. Measurements were collected from 2017-2019 as part of the Atmospheric Carbon and Transport (ACT) America aircraft campaign and encompass much of the central and eastern United States. We find that for the fall, winter, and spring campaigns, C2H6 data consistently exceeds values that would be expected based on EPA O&G leak rate estimates. C2H6 observations from the summer 2019 dataset show significantly lower C2H6 enhancements in the southcentral region that cannot be reconciled with data from the other three seasons, either due to complex meteorological conditions or a temporal shift in the emissions. Converting the fall, winter, and spring season posterior C2H6 emissions estimate to an inventory of O&G CH4 emissions, we estimate that O&G CH4 emissions are larger than EPA inventory values by more than 50%. Uncertainties in the gas composition data limit the effectiveness of using C2H6 as a proxy for O&G CH4 emissions. These limits could be resolved retroactively by increasing the availability of industry-collected gas composition data.