loading page

Anisotropic Zonation in the Lithosphere of Central North America: Influence of a Strong Cratonic Lithosphere on the Mid-Continent Rift
  • +7
  • Oyekunle Ola,
  • Andrew Frederiksen,
  • Trevor Bollmann,
  • Suzan Van der Lee,
  • Darbyshire Fiona,
  • Emily Wolin,
  • Justin Revenaugh,
  • Carol Stein,
  • Seth Stein,
  • Michael Wysession
Oyekunle Ola
University of Manitoba
Author Profile
Andrew Frederiksen
University of Manitoba

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Trevor Bollmann
Northwestern University
Author Profile
Suzan Van der Lee
Northwestern University
Author Profile
Darbyshire Fiona
Université du Québec à Montréal
Author Profile
Emily Wolin
Northwestern University
Author Profile
Justin Revenaugh
University of Minnesota
Author Profile
Carol Stein
University of Illinois at Chicago
Author Profile
Seth Stein
Northwestern University
Author Profile
Michael Wysession
Washington University in St. Louis
Author Profile

Abstract

We present shear-wave splitting analyses of SKS and SKKS waves recorded at sixteen Superior Province Rifting Earthscope Experiment (SPREE) seismic stations on the north shore of Lake Superior, as well as fifteen selected Earthscope Transportable Array instruments south of the lake. These instruments bracket the Mid-Continent Rift (MCR) and sample the Superior, Penokean, Yavapai and Mazatzal tectonic provinces. The data set can be explained by a single layer of anisotropic fabric, which we interpret to be dominated by a lithospheric contribution. The fast S polarization directions are consistently ENE-WSW, but the split time varies greatly across the study area, showing strong anisotropy (up to 1.48 s) in the western Superior, moderate anisotropy in the eastern Superior, and moderate to low anisotropy in the terranes south of Lake Superior. We locate two localized zones of very low split time (less than 0.6 s) adjacent to the MCR: one in the Nipigon Embayment, an MCR-related magmatic feature immediately north of Lake Superior, and the other adjacent to the eastern end of the lake, at the southern end of the Kapuskasing Structural Zone (KSZ). Both low-splitting zones are adjacent to sharp bends in the MCR axis. We interpret these two zones, along with a low-velocity linear feature imaged by a previous tomographic study beneath Minnesota and the Dakotas, as failed lithospheric branches of the MCR. Given that all three of these branches failed to propagate into the Superior Province lithosphere, we propose that the sharp bend of the MCR through Lake Superior is a consequence of the high mechanical strength of the Superior lithosphere ca. 1.1 Ga.
Jun 2016Published in Tectonophysics volume 683 on pages 367-381. 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.06.031